Rachmawati, Sari and -, Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D and -, Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph. D (2018) Criticizing Strategies in English and Javanese Languages: A Comparative Study. Thesis thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER I)
CHAPTER I.pdf Download (22kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER II)
CHAPTER II.pdf Download (125kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER III)
CHAPTER III.pdf Download (36kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER IV)
CHAPTER IV.pdf Download (518kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER V)
CHAPTER V.pdf Download (21kB) |
|
PDF (LAMPIRAN)
APPENDIX.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (304kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (16kB) |
|
PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (341kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
ARTIKEL PUBLIKASI ILMIAH.pdf Download (738kB) |
Abstract
This research is a pragmatics study of speech acts on EFL (English as Foreign Language) learners and native Javanese in expressing criticism. This study was conducted to analyze the criticizing strategies used by EFL learners who have Javanese background and native Javanese, and to analyze the comparison between them using qualitative approach. The subjects of this study are 27 EFL learners and 30 native Javanese speakers. Data for this study is elicited from the respondents through Discourse Completion Task (DCT) which consists of six situations with different levels of status and ages. The respondents in each group are asked to write the expression of criticism to complete the DCT. Their responses are collected to be analyzed based on the Nguyens theory of criticizing strategies. The findings of the study show that most of the respondents from the first group (EFL learners) utilized indirect strategies more than 70% in three of six conditions (close-higher, close-lower, unfamiliar-equal) and almost 50% in one other condition (unfamiliar higher). The rest of the conditions are using combination strategy (close-equal) in 56%. Only in unfamiliar-higher situation, almost 50% of them use direct strategies. In the other condition, all of the respondents in Native Javanese group utilized indirect and combination strategies more than 45%. None of them used direct strategies more than 25% in all of the conditions. It is also found that in average, most of two of group participants used indirect strategies in performing criticizing acts.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Thesis) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | speech acts, criticizing strategies, English, Javanese, comparison |
Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics |
Divisions: | Fakultas Pasca Sarjana > Magister Pengkajian Bahasa |
Depositing User: | Sari Rachmawati |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jul 2019 08:59 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2019 08:59 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/74151 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |