A Pragmatic Analysis Of Argumentation Strategies In Zakir Naik’s Debate Show

Sholihah, Hidayati and , Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D and , Mauly Halwat Hikmat, M.Hum.,Ph.D. (2018) A Pragmatic Analysis Of Argumentation Strategies In Zakir Naik’s Debate Show. Thesis thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (ARTICLE PUBLICATION) ARTICLE PUBLICATION.pdf Download (475kB)
	PDF (Front Page) COVER.pdf Download (443kB)
	PDF (CHAPTER I) CHAPTER I.pdf Download (535kB)
	PDF (CHAPTER II) CHAPTER II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (780kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (CHAPTER III) CHAPTER III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (480kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (CHAPTER IV) CHAPTER IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	PDF (CHAPTER V) CHAPTER V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (44kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (BIBLIOGRAPHY) BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf Download (44kB)
	PDF (APPENDIX) APPENDIX.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (413kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi) SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (100kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study aims to identify the argumentation strategies applied by Zakir Naik in his debate shows and to describe its politeness strategies included in Zakir Naik’s argument in his debate show. This is a descriptive-qualitative research using the series stages, they are watching Zakir Naik’s debate shows, transcribing the video of Zakir Naik’s debate shows, identifying and observing the data contained argumentation and its strategies, signing the argumentations and the strategies, reducing the uncategorized data, gathering the data, coding, and analyzing. The object of this research is argumentations applied by Zakir Naik. The data source is Zakir Naik’s debate shows from YouTube. This study utilizes theory from Freeley and Steinberg (2000) and Pecorino (2001) to identify the argumentation strategies applied by Zakir Naik in his debate shows. Besides that, this study also applies Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory (1987) to describe its politeness strategies. Finally, this study can reveal the argumentation strategies and its politeness strategy. (1) For displaying the argumentation strategies, this study found Zakir applied some strategies in his arguments, namely Impromptu (whole debate shows), Reasoning by Example (16.05% or 13/81), Reasoning by Analogy (14.81% or 12/81), Causal Reasoning (8.64% or 7/81), Reasoning by Sign (2.47% or 2/81), Rebuttal (13.58% or 11/81), Refutation (14.81% or 12/81), and Argument from Revelation (29.63% or 24/81). (2) For emerging politeness strategies of argumentation, this study found Zakir applied Bald on Record (1.88% or 1/53), Positive Politeness (64.15% or 34/53), Negative Politeness (7.55% or 4/53), and Off-Record (26.42% or 14/53). In short, Zakir mostly makes Argument from Revelation as the strategy of argumentation and Positive Politeness using in-group identity markers.

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Thesis)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Argumentation, Argumentation strategy, Politeness Strategy, Zakir Naik’s debate shows
Subjects:	X General Subject
Divisions:	Fakultas Pasca Sarjana > Magister Pengkajian Bahasa
Depositing User:	HIDAYATI SHOLIHAH
Date Deposited:	16 Aug 2018 02:26
Last Modified:	21 Nov 2019 02:47
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/66798

Actions (login required)

View Item