A Pragmatic Analysis on Anger Expression Found in Donald Trump's Instagram Comments

Dikhawati, Intan Jannah and -, Dra. Siti Zuhriah Ariatmi, M. Hum. (2019) A Pragmatic Analysis on Anger Expression Found in Donald Trump's Instagram Comments. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Publication Article) PUBLICATION ARTICLE.pdf Download (751kB)
	PDF (Front Page) FRONT PAGE.pdf Download (688kB)
	PDF (Chapter 1) CHAPTER 1.pdf Download (109kB)
	PDF (Chapter 2) CHAPTER 2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (198kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Chapter 3) CHAPTER 3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (91kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Chapter 4) CHAPTER 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (716kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Chapter 5) CHAPTER 5.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (139kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bibliography) BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf Download (104kB)
	PDF (Appendix) APPENDIX.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (332kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi Ilmiah) SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (74kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study aims (1) to find the intentions of anger expression, (2) to reveal the implicature of anger expression, and (3) to elaborate the maxim violation found in Donald Trump’s Instagram comments. This study belongs to descriptive qualitative research in which the data are collected through observation and documentation. The writer uses Tone Analyzer website to classify the anger comments. There are 31 selected data that are analyzed. The data are analyzed through Yule’s theory (1996) of intention and implicature, and Grice’s theory (1975) of maxim violation. The results show that (1) there are 7 intentions of anger expression found in Donald Trump’s Instagram comments. They are 42% of mocking, 16% of blaming, 3% of suggesting, 16% of complaining, 13% of threatening, 3% of accusing, 7% of commanding. It means that netter prefer to laugh at somebody unkind when they are angry (2) There are also 2 types of implicatures. They are 10% of conventional implicatures and 90% of conversational implicatures. It means that netter depend their comments on the special context to keep the conversation in a polite way even though they are angry. In addition, (3) there are 10% of maxim violation of quantity, 39% of maxim violation of quality, 35% of maxim violation of relation, and 16% of maxim violation of manner. It means that netter don’t speak the way it should be by giving no evidence that can support their statements.

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Anger Expression, Comments, Donald Trump, Pragmatics.
Subjects:	L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User:	INTAN JANNAH DIKHAWATI
Date Deposited:	03 Aug 2019 04:31
Last Modified:	03 Aug 2019 04:31
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/75404

Actions (login required)

View Item