Hendriyanto, Agus and -, Muhamad Toyib, M.Pd (2018) Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Team Assisted Individualized (TAI) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) Siswa Kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 5 Surakarta. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
This is the latest version of this item.
![[img]](http://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASPUB.pdf Download (797kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
Halaman Depan.pdf Download (920kB) |
|
PDF (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf Download (197kB) |
|
PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (511kB) |
|
PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (631kB) |
|
PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (845kB) |
|
PDF (BAB V)
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (189kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (307kB) |
|
PDF (Lampiran)
Lampiran full dan Surat Riset.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (11MB) |
|
PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi Ilmiah)
Surat Pernyataan Publikasi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (541kB) |
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to find out: (1) significant difference between the jigsaw and TAI learning model toward results of the learning of mathematics. (2) a significant difference towards the results of learning mathematics in review of the level of AQ students (3) the existence of interactions between teaching models with the level of AQ students to the results of learning mathematics. This study is a quantitative research with quasi-experimental research design. The population of this study is 98 students of 7th grade of SMP Muhammadiyah 5 Surakarta, Three classes were chosen for the sample of this study by cluster random sampling, The first class was treated using Jigsaw model, the second class was treated using TAI model, and the third class class was treated using conventional model. class was treated using: (1) there is a difference between math learning outcomes learning Jigsaw, TAI and conventional, Jigsaw is better than TAI and conservation while TAI and conventional have the same results. (2) there may be differences in terms of learning math results level of AQ student. Students with a level of AQ climbers better than students with a level of AQ campers and quitters, while students with a level of AQ campers better than students with a level of AQ quitters (3) there are interaction of models learning (Jigsaw, TAI and conventional) with a level of AQ (climbers, campers, quitters) against the results of the learning of mathematics. Study on the model of jigsaw, students with a level of AQ climbers have results learning math better than students with a level of AQ quitters. Keywords: jigsaw, team assisted individualized, math achievement, adversity quotient
| Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | jigsaw, team assisted individualized, hasil belajar matematika, adversity quotient |
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Matematika |
| Depositing User: | AGUS HENDRIYANTO |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Dec 2018 07:36 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Dec 2018 07:36 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/69482 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Team Assisted Individualized (TAI) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) Siswa Kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 5 Surakarta. (deposited 17 Dec 2018 07:36) [Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
