Rokhimah, Safitri and , Sri Rejeki, M.Pd, M.Sc (2018) Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VII di SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Halaman depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (602kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (27kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (79kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (141kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (270kB) |
|
PDF (Bab V)
BAB V-165.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (22kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA-226.pdf Download (31kB) |
|
PDF (Lampiran)
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi Ilmiah)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (427kB) |
|
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI-fiks 11.pdf Download (873kB) |
Abstract
This study aims to describe students' critical thinking skills based on learning styles with visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic categories. The type of research is qualitative. Sebjek research consists of three students for each style of learning in class VII A SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta. Data collection techniques in this study is a questionnaire technique to find out student learning styles, test techniques to determine students' critical thinking skills and interviews. The test is executed during the learning and learning process on the linear equation of one variable. The results of the tests and interviews are analyzed based on the critical critical ability indicators as follows: (1) Provide a simple explanation, (2) build basic skills, (3) provide further explanation, (4) skill set strategy and tactics, (5) write conclusions . The results showed that: (1) for indicator 1 visual and kinesthetic students were less able to provide simple explanation, while the auditorial students were able to give a simple explanation; (2) indicator 2 the visual students were less able to build basic skill while the auditorial and kinesthetic students were able to build a basic skill. (4) indicator 4 all visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic students are able to provide further explanation, (5)indicator 5 visual, auditorial students (3) indicator 3 all students of the three types of learning styles are less able to develop skills in managing strategy and tactics , and kinesthetic is incapable of writing conclusions.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | learning style, critical thinking ability |
Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Matematika |
Depositing User: | SAFITRI ROKHIMAH |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jul 2018 06:56 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2018 06:56 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/63165 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |