Ningtyas, Tiara Titian and , drg. Nina Runting, Sp.BMM (2021) Kajian Kekurangan dan Kelebihan Anestesi Blok Mandibula Direct Technique dan Indirect Technique pada Onset, Durasi, dan Intensitas Nyeri:Literature Review. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASPUB TIARA FINAL 2.pdf Download (867kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Bab V)
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI TIARA.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (262kB) |
Abstract
Background: Local anesthesia is as loss of sensation in a circumscribed area of the body caused by depression of excitation in nerve endings or inhibition of the conduction process in peripheral nerves. Local anesthetics in dentistry are indicated for various procedures that can cause pain. The most widely used local anesthetic for restorative and surgical procedures in the mandibule is the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique which consists of a direct technique and an indirect technique. The IANB direct and indirect techniques are to provide good effectiveness, such as: a fast onset of action, no irritation or excessive pain on injection, and a long duration of action. Objective: To determine the advantages and disadvantages of direct and indirect mandibular block anesthesia in terms of onset, duration, and intensity of pain. Method: The design used is a literature review, the data is secondary data collected using a search engine Science Direct, Pubmed, Ebsco Host, and Google Scholar. The criteria used are articles published in 2010-2020. Results: Based on the articles collected, the results showed that the onset of the IANB direct technique is between 30 to 170 seconds and IANB indirect technique is 90 to 270 seconds, the duration of the IANB direct technique is 90-260 minutes, the IANB indirect technique has a duration of 60-194 minutes, and there is no difference pain intensity between the IANB direct technique and the indirect technique, whereas pain caused by the injection of the two techniques is mild pain with a percentage of 38% to 54%. Conclusion: The direct mandibular block anesthesia technique has advantages over the indirect technique in terms of onset and duration. The intensity of pain caused by the direct and indirect technique of IANB injection showed no significant difference.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Anesthesia, Mandibular Block, Direct Technique, Indirect Technique, Onset, Duration, Pain Intensity |
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi > Kedokteran Gigi |
Depositing User: | TIARA TITIAN NINGTYAS |
Date Deposited: | 13 Aug 2021 06:35 |
Last Modified: | 13 Aug 2021 06:35 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/93121 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |