Artificial Intelegent Pada Sistem Peradilan : Studi Kasus Pengembangan "Robot Judge" Di Estonia

Gianramadhan, Abel and , Diana Setiawati, S.H., LL.M. (2026) Artificial Intelegent Pada Sistem Peradilan : Studi Kasus Pengembangan "Robot Judge" Di Estonia. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

[img] PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf

Download (666kB)
[img] PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf

Download (1MB)
[img] PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf

Download (416kB)
[img] PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (336kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (450kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (129kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (267kB)
[img] PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (668kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has had a significant impact on various sectors, including the judicial system. One notable innovation is the emergence of the "AI Judge" concept, referring to the use of AI to assist or even replace human judges in resolving legal disputes. This study aims to analyze the legality of using AI Judges within the judicial system of Estonia and to examine how the judicial codes of ethics in Estonia and Indonesia regulate such technological use, based on the principles of justice and accountability. A normative juridical approach is employed, with a case study on the implementation of AI Judges in Estonia, a country recognized for having one of the most advanced digital infrastructures in Europe. The findings indicate that Estonia has developed a digital judicial system that allows the use of AI in handling minor cases, such as administrative disputes and low-value claims. This implementation has proven to improve efficiency and reduce the workload of human judges. The study highlights a difference in approach between Estonia and Indonesia in responding to technological integration within judicial processes. Estonia embraces digital innovation more openly, whereas Indonesia adopts a more cautious stance to uphold judicial integrity and human-centered justice. These findings are expected to contribute to the development of digital legal policies in Indonesia amid the global trend of technological transformation.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, AI Judge, Judicial System, Estonia, Justice, Accountability, Judicial Ethics
Subjects: K Law
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Politik > S1 Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: ABEL GIAN RAMADHAN
Date Deposited: 10 Aug 2026 07:46
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2026 07:46
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/146898

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item