PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM UJARAN KEBENCIAN BERMUATAN SARA DI YOGYAKARTA

Justicio, Marchiko Naufal and , Dr. Marisa Kurnianingsih S.H., M.H., M.Kn. (2026) PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM UJARAN KEBENCIAN BERMUATAN SARA DI YOGYAKARTA. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) Naskah Publikasi-MARCHIKO NAUFAL JUSTICIO-C100220196.pdf Download (452kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) Halaman Depan.pdf Download (987kB)
	PDF (Bab I) Bab 1.pdf Download (485kB)
	PDF (Bab II) Bab 2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (461kB)
	PDF (Bab III) Bab 3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (527kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) Bab 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (324kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) Daftar Pustaka.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (331kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) Surat Pernyataan Publikasi- 23-02-2026.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (852kB)

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyze the construction of judges' legal considerations in deciding criminal cases of hate speech containing elements of Ethnicity, Religion, Race, and Inter-group (SARA) in Indonesia, as well as their position within the framework of Islamic criminal law. The background of this research stems from the massive internet penetration in Indonesia, reaching 221.5 million users which poses risks of social conflict and legal uncertainty due to inconsistent judicial decisions in similar cases. This research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptiveanalytical approach, using primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and court decisions, particularly Decision Number 323/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Yogyakarta, which are analyzed qualitatively.The findings of this research indicate that judges‟ considerations in deciding cases of hate speech containing elements of ethnicity, religion, race, and intergroup relations (SARA) consist of juridical and non-juridical considerations. Juridical considerations are based on the fulfillment of the elements of Article 28 paragraph (2) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law through electronic evidence and expert testimony, while non-juridical considerations include the social impacts caused by the act as well as the personal circumstances of the defendant. Furthermore, from the perspective of Islamic criminal law, hate speech containing SARA elements is regarded as an act of ihtiqar that violates the principle of Hifz al-‟irdh (protection of honor), and therefore is subject to ta‟zir sanctions, the determination of which is left to the discretion of the judge for the sake of public welfare.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Pertimbangan hakim, ujaran kebencian, sara, hukum islam, UU ITE
Subjects:	K Law > Indonesia Law > Perangkat Hukum > Hakim K Law > Indonesia Law
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > S1 Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	MARCHIKO NAUFAL JUSTICIO
Date Deposited:	24 Feb 2026 03:44
Last Modified:	24 Feb 2026 03:44
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/143382

Actions (login required)

View Item