Penerapan Unsur Percobaan Dan Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Tindak Pidana Pasal 132 UU Narkotika

Welmandito, Refo and , Dr. Muchamad Iksan, S.H., (2025) Penerapan Unsur Percobaan Dan Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Tindak Pidana Pasal 132 UU Narkotika. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) naskah publikasi.pdf Download (254kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (499kB)
	PDF (Bab I) BAB I.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (256kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (270kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (283kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (59kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (190kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (74kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Article 132 of the Narcotics Law governs criminal attempts and conspiracies involving narcotics. This study's central research question concerns the formulation of the components of criminal conspiracy in criminal activities as outlined in Article 132 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law, as well as the application of the elements of trial in criminal crimes under the same provision. The method of data gathering is descriptive research with a focus on study literature; the approach is normative legal; and the data is evaluated using both qualitative and deductive techniques. The Cibinong District Court Decision 237/Pid.Sus/2019/PN is therefore incorporated herein. The CBI follows the theory of material objective experiment because it was proven that the perpetrator engaged in illegal activities related to narcotics and precursors by selling and acting as an intermediary for the purchase and sale of Class I narcotics (not plants) and by possessing and storing plants that contain Class I narcotics. This decision was made by the Panel of Judges in Bangkinang District Court, who considered the legal facts and directly chose the second alternative indictment as outlined in Article 112 Paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 132 Paragraph (1) of Republic of Indonesia Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics. The importance of law enforcement officials reaching a consensus on the interpretation of trials and Article 53 of the Criminal Code in relation to the elements of Article 132 of the Narcotics Law, the imposition of maximum sentences on offenders, and the necessity of a more comprehensive effort to eradicate drugs associated with evil conspiracies involving multiple individuals, through education and understanding. the neighborhood by means of a joint effort between BNN and the local police department.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Narcotics Crime, Elements of Attempt and Criminal Conspiracy, Article 132 (1) of the Narcotics Law
Subjects:	K Law > Law (General) K Law > Indonesia Law > Hukum Pidana
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > S1 Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	REFO WELMANDITO
Date Deposited:	04 Feb 2025 03:31
Last Modified:	04 Feb 2025 03:31
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/130882

Actions (login required)

View Item