Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Adanya Surat Kuasa Jual Menjual Agunan Kredit Dalam Perkara Kredit Macet Perkara No.38/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Skt Di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta

Wibowo, Arif and -, Dr. Kelik Wardiono, S.H., M.H (2020) Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Adanya Surat Kuasa Jual Menjual Agunan Kredit Dalam Perkara Kredit Macet Perkara No.38/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Skt Di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

[img] PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASIKU.pdf

Download (711kB)
[img] PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf

Download (640kB)
[img] PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf

Download (271kB)
[img] PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (327kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (266kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (87kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (161kB)
[img] PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (265kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study aims to determine the position of the power of attorney to sell collateral in a civil law perspective and to find out the consideration of case examiner judge No.38 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN.Skt in assessing evidence of power of attorney to sell collateral in bad credit cases at the Surakarta District Court. The research method is carried out with a doctrinal (normative) approach because in this research law is conceptualized as written norms that are made and promulgated by authorized state institutions or officials. This type of research is descriptive with data sources in the form of secondary data, namely the Surakarta District Court Decision. The data collection method used literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods based on deductive logic. The results show that the Power of Attorney that has a legal position based on Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights is a power of sale power agreed upon by creditors and debtors as an effort to resolve bad credit by debtors as stipulated in Article 20 paragraph 2 of the Law. Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights and based on the Decision No. 38/Pdt.GS/2019/PN.Skt Surakarta District Court is in accordance with the applicable positive law, where the sale and purchase agreement for the object of the guarantee of the mortgage between the creditor and the buyer is based on a power of attorney to sell which does not meet the requirements of Article 20 of the Law Law No.4 of 1996 does not provide legal protection to creditors and buyers.

Item Type: Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: judge consideration, credit collateral, bad credit
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User: ARIF WIBOWO
Date Deposited: 28 Dec 2020 02:28
Last Modified: 28 Dec 2020 02:28
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/88137

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item