Wibowo, Arif and -, Dr. Kelik Wardiono, S.H., M.H (2020) Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Adanya Surat Kuasa Jual Menjual Agunan Kredit Dalam Perkara Kredit Macet Perkara No.38/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Skt Di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![]() |
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASIKU.pdf Download (711kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (640kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (271kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (327kB) | Request a copy |
![]() |
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (266kB) | Request a copy |
![]() |
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (87kB) | Request a copy |
![]() |
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (161kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (265kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
This study aims to determine the position of the power of attorney to sell collateral in a civil law perspective and to find out the consideration of case examiner judge No.38 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN.Skt in assessing evidence of power of attorney to sell collateral in bad credit cases at the Surakarta District Court. The research method is carried out with a doctrinal (normative) approach because in this research law is conceptualized as written norms that are made and promulgated by authorized state institutions or officials. This type of research is descriptive with data sources in the form of secondary data, namely the Surakarta District Court Decision. The data collection method used literature study, then analyzed using qualitative methods based on deductive logic. The results show that the Power of Attorney that has a legal position based on Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights is a power of sale power agreed upon by creditors and debtors as an effort to resolve bad credit by debtors as stipulated in Article 20 paragraph 2 of the Law. Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights and based on the Decision No. 38/Pdt.GS/2019/PN.Skt Surakarta District Court is in accordance with the applicable positive law, where the sale and purchase agreement for the object of the guarantee of the mortgage between the creditor and the buyer is based on a power of attorney to sell which does not meet the requirements of Article 20 of the Law Law No.4 of 1996 does not provide legal protection to creditors and buyers.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | judge consideration, credit collateral, bad credit |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | ARIF WIBOWO |
Date Deposited: | 28 Dec 2020 02:28 |
Last Modified: | 28 Dec 2020 02:28 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/88137 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |