An Error Analysis on The Use of Modal Auxiliary Made by English Education Students at Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta

Pertiwi, Dian Putri and , Hepy Adityarini, Ph. D (2019) An Error Analysis on The Use of Modal Auxiliary Made by English Education Students at Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

[img] PDF (Publication Article)
1. PUBLICATION ARTICLE rev.pdf

Download (661kB)
[img] PDF (Front Page)
3. FRONT PAGE rev.pdf

Download (808kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter I)
4. CHAPTER 1.pdf

Download (160kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter II)
5. CHAPTER 2.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (101kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter III)
6. CHAPTER 3 rev.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (80kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter IV)
7. CHAPTER 4 rev.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (265kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter V)
8. CHAPTER 5.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (65kB)
[img] PDF (Bibliography)
REFERENCES.pdf

Download (102kB)
[img] PDF (Appendix)
APPENDICES.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (161kB)
[img] PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi)
2. PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (52kB)

Abstract

This study aim to describe the type of modal auxiliary used which is not in line with the usage or semantic meaning and illustrates the errors on the use of modal auxiliary that is often done by English Education Students at Muhammadiyah University of. The instrument used in this study is an essay test containing 9 modal auxiliaries. Subject in this study were 100 students of the English Education Students at Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. The results showed that the semantic meanings had a lot of errors, namely 'prediction' (11%), while the modal that often had errors was 'may' (28.9%) and 'will' (27.2%) and the lowest was 'could' and 'might' (2.7% for each), as for modal that does not appear at all namely 'shall '. This study also examined 4 types of errors that occurred, namely 'misformation' with the highest number (48.2%), followed by 'addition' (26.5%), and 'omission' (25.2%), while the type was 'misordering' not used in this study.

Item Type: Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Modal Auxiliary, Error Analysis, Semantic Meaning
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: DIAN PUTRI PERTIWI
Date Deposited: 15 Feb 2019 06:13
Last Modified: 15 Feb 2019 06:13
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/71461

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item