NURAINI, ALIF AYU and , Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D and , Aryati Prasetyarini, S.Pd, M.Pd (2016) LECTURER CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING CLASS AT ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (PUBLICATION ARTICLE)
PUBLICATION ARTICLE.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (FRONT PAGE)
FRONT PAGE.pdf Download (860kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER I)
CHAPTER 1.pdf Download (159kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER II)
CHAPTER II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (277kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER III)
CHAPTER III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (168kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER IV)
CHAPTER IV acc bu aryati.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (280kB) |
|
PDF (CHAPTER V)
CHAPTER V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (166kB) |
|
PDF (BIBLIOGRAPHY)
BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf Download (133kB) |
|
PDF (APPENDIX)
data.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB) |
|
PDF (SURAT PERNYATAAN ARTIKEL PUBLIKASI)
SURAT PERNYATAAN ARTIKEL PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (88kB) |
Abstract
Alif Ayu Nuraini. A 320 122 003. LECTUREER CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING CLASS AT ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. Research Paper. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. 2016. This study aims to describe the types of corrective feedback used by the lecturers in writing class and to describe the dominant types of corrective feedback used by the lecturers in writing class at the English Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. The researcher employs descriptive qualitative method. By this method, the researcher uses the lecturer feedback activities in writing class as a data source, and the data of this research are information about the lecturer’s corrective feedback given to the students in writing class. The researcher used observation and document in collecting data. Then to analyze the data the researcher used interactive model. The result of this research paper show that first, the researcher found 103 data of lecturers corrective feedback and there are 3 types of lecture corrective feedback and the classification used by the lecturers, namely (1) Oral feedback: 45 data and the classifications are Explicit Correction: 10 data, Recast: 8 data, Clarification Requests: 15 data, Metalinguistic Feedback: 7 data, Elicitation: 3 data, Repetition: 2 data. (2) Positive Feedback (Feedback on content): 47 data and the classifications are Acknowledging a correct answer: 15 data, Indicating an Incorrect Answer: 1 data, Praising: 5 data, Expanding or Modifying Student Answer: 9 data, Repeating: 6 data, Summarizing: 3 data, and Criticizing: 8 data. (3) Negative Feedback (Feedback on form): 11 data and the classifications are Asking the students to repeat: 3 data, Pointing out the error and asking the students to self-correct: 5 data, Commenting on an error and explaining why it is wrong, without having the students repeat the correct form: 2 data, and Asking other students to correct the error: 1 data. Second, the researcher found that, the dominant types of corrective feedback used by the lecturers are Clarification Requests, and Acknowledging a Correct Answer. The researcher found 15 data in each type. Keywords: corrective feedback, writing
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Keywords: corrective feedback, writing |
Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) P Language and Literature > PE English |
Divisions: | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris |
Depositing User: | ALIF AYU NURAINI |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jul 2016 02:25 |
Last Modified: | 27 Jul 2016 02:25 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/44453 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |