Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dan Penggelapan Dana Di Pengadilan Negeri

Slamet, Nashrullah Nafi Al Ahad and , Dr. Rizka, S.Ag., M.H. (2026) Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dan Penggelapan Dana Di Pengadilan Negeri. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) Naskah Publikasi_Nashrullah Nafi.pdf Download (276kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) Halaman depan_Skripsi_Nashrullah nafi f-1-14.pdf Download (4MB)
	PDF (Bab I) Bab 1_Skripsi_Nashrullah nafi f-15-28.pdf Download (271kB)
	PDF (Bab II) Bab 2_Skripsi_Nashrullah nafi f-29-50.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (136kB)
	PDF (Bab III) Bab 3_Skripsi_Nashrullah nafi f-51-84.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (252kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) Bab 4_Skripsi_Nashrullah nafi f-85-86.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (9kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) Daftar Pustaka_Skripsi_Nashrullah nafi f-87-94.pdf Download (85kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) Surat Pernyataan Publikasi_Nashrullah Nafi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)

Abstract

This study is motivated by the dominance of punitive approaches in resolving fraud and embezzlement cases, which have not fully restored victims’ losses. Restorative Justice emerges as an alternative approach that emphasizes recovery, offender accountability, and balance among the parties involved. However, its implementation in practice still faces various challenges. This study aims to analyze the application of Restorative Justice in handling fraud and embezzlement cases and to identify the obstacles encountered. This research employs a normative legal method with case and conceptual approaches. The data were obtained from statutory regulations, court decisions, and legal literature, and analyzed qualitatively. The results show that Restorative Justice has not been optimally implemented and remains limited in practice. Its application is only reflected in judicial considerations as mitigating factors, such as the offender’s confession and remorse. Moreover, the recovery of victims’ losses has not become the primary focus. The obstacles include juridical issues, judicial process constraints, conditions of victims and offenders, and the characteristics of the crimes. Thus, Restorative Justice still functions as a complementary approach and has not yet become the primary mechanism in resolving criminal cases.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Restorative Justice, Penipuan, Penggelapan Dana, Hukum Pidana
Subjects:	K Law
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > S1 Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	NASHRULLAH NAFI AL AHAD SLAMET
Date Deposited:	03 Aug 2026 02:49
Last Modified:	03 Aug 2026 02:49
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/146666

Actions (login required)

View Item