Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sama Usaha Distribusi Bahan Pokok Rumah Tangga (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta)

Saputri, Dyah Rosa Saridevi Arum and , Nuswardhani, S.H, S.U (2022) Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sama Usaha Distribusi Bahan Pokok Rumah Tangga (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (824kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (417kB)
	PDF (Bab I) BAB I.pdf Download (218kB)
	PDF (Bab II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (516kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (538kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (136kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (136kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) PERNYATAAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (97kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

In a business cooperation agreement there are two parties, namely investors or investors and business managers. In the agreement, investors are required to provide capital funds to business managers to run their businesses, and business managers are required to return capital funds and provide profit sharing money of 2.5% of the capital money. However, the business manager did not carry out his obligations in accordance with the agreement, so the Plaintiff declared a default. This study aims to determine the judge's consideration in the evidence and his decision in deciding the case of breach of contract for the distribution of household staples. The approach method used in this research is normative because what will be examined in this research are legal principles, legal principles regarding the process of settling default cases. This research is descriptive in nature because it clearly describes the process of settling default cases in a business cooperation agreement for the distribution of household staples in the District Court. In considering the evidence that it is proven that the Defendant did not return the capital money and paid the profit sharing to the Plaintiff, the Defendant is declared to have defaulted. This decision was won by the Plaintiff because the Plaintiff was able to prove his claim. In his decision, the judge decided with a verstek decision because the Defendant was not present during the trial even though he had been properly summoned. So that even though the Defendant is not present, he must continue to implement his decision because the Verstek decision has permanent legal force and has legal certainty. If the decision is not implemented by the Defendant, then the Plaintiff may submit an execution to the District Court.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Perjanjian Kerja Sama, Perkara Wanprestasi, Penyelesaian di Pengadilan Negeri.
Subjects:	K Law > KI Indonesia > KP Perdata
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	DYAH ROSA SARIDEVI ARUM SAPUTRI
Date Deposited:	26 Feb 2022 07:25
Last Modified:	26 Feb 2022 07:25
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/98874

Actions (login required)

View Item