Arsita, Dea and , Dr. Natangsa Surbakti, SH., M.Hum (2022) Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan Arisan Online (Analisis Putusan Nomor 209/ /Pid.B/2018/PN.Tpg). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASPUB DEA ARSITA.pdf Download (392kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (562kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (313kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (284kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (520kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (138kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (153kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (205kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Online arisan is that arisan means several groups collect money or items of equal value and then withdraw prizes between them. Prize draws are held from time to time until everyone wins. This research focuses on 3 things, namely, first knowing the modus operandi of online fraud in the matter of sentencing Number 209 / Pid.B / 2018PN.Tpg. second, knowing the legal considerations by the judge in the criminal investigation of online fraud in the case of sentencing No. 209 / Pid.B / 2018PN.Tpg. third, knowing the perspective of Islamic law against the criminal act of online fraud in the case of the case of the 209/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tpg verdict. Normative research is essentially a systematic written law in the form of legislation that will be associated with the subject, object, rights and obligations of related legal events. The modus operandi carried out by the accused by gathering members by attracting the sympathy of prospective members by giving the promise that the arisan is trustworthy and gets a large profit according to the variety of arisan that followed. Initially the defendant posted on arisel group (Arisan Seli) on social media on Facebook. The consideration of judges contained pungli violations has been regulated in the Criminal Code (Criminal Code) contained in Article 378. The judge's ruling, when legal sanctions were imposed on the defendant Salindri Ananda Tulas Agustine Als Seli was hereby sentenced to Prison for 2 (Two) years. The provisions in the regulation that are not allowed are to boast the disgrace of others, arisan is not allowed is gharar, masyir, gambling and something that is still estimated cannot be ascertained profits and losses. The verdict indicted by the judge is correct in accordance with the provisions of the Law both in view of Indonesia's positive law and Islamic criminal law.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Fraud, Arisan Online, Article 378 of the Criminal Code. |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KI Indonesia > KN Pidana |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | DEA ARSITA |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jan 2022 04:39 |
Last Modified: | 22 Jan 2022 04:39 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/96741 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |