Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Waralaba antara Pemberi Waralaba Dengan Penerima Waralaba (Studi Pada Waralaba Makanan Lokal Tahu Kriuk Oslo)

Novera, Novera and , Septarina Budiwati, S.H, M.H.,C.N (2021) Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Waralaba antara Pemberi Waralaba Dengan Penerima Waralaba (Studi Pada Waralaba Makanan Lokal Tahu Kriuk Oslo). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) Naskah Publikasi-3.pdf Download (578kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (738kB)
	PDF (Bab I) BAB I.pdf Download (306kB)
	PDF (Bab II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (331kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (333kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (100kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (162kB)
	PDF (Lampiran) LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (767kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (245kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Franchising is a business cooperation business in which Intellectual Property Rights are held and owned by the franchisor and can be used by other parties or the franchisee. In the implementation of a franchise business, its activities are based on a franchise agreement. In this study, the author examines the form and content of the Tahu Kriuk Oslo franchise agreement and how the legal relationship between the parties in the Tahu Kriuk Oslo Franchise agreement is. The research method used by the author to examine the Tofu Kriuk Oslo franchise agreement is to use a normative juridical research method, namely to examine whether the form and content as well as the legal relationship in the Tahu Kriuk Oslo Franchise agreement have complied with the provisions of the Agreement Law and Government Regulation no. 42 of 2007 concerning Franchise. The results of this study indicate that the form and content of the franchise agreement have not met the provisions of Article 5 of Government Regulation no. 42 of 2007 concerning Franchise. The Tofu Kriuk Oslo Franchise Agreement does not contain the types of intellectual property rights, training guidance to franchisees, the term of the agreement in this case is the expiration date of the agreement, the rights of heirs and the procedure for extension as well as the provisions in Article 5 of Government Regulation no. 42 of 2007 concerning Franchise and legal relations held by both parties have been stated in articles 1 to 3 using the principle of freedom of contract.

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	franchise, franchise agreement, legal relationship
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	NOVERA
Date Deposited:	24 Sep 2021 06:15
Last Modified:	24 Sep 2021 06:15
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/94504

Actions (login required)

View Item