Tifanabila, Syanaz and , Mutimatun Ni'ami, S.H., M.Hum., (2021) Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pembatalan Perkawinan Karena Pemalsuan Identitas (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sragen Nomor: 0257/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Sr). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
7. NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (931kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
1. HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (753kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
2. BAB I.pdf Download (210kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
3. BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (340kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
4. BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (503kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
5. BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (39kB) |
|
PDF (Lampiran)
8. LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (109kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
6. DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (93kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
9. PERNYATAAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (190kB) |
Abstract
Research related to the Juridical Review of Marriage Cancellation Due to Identity Falsification (Study of the Sragen Religious Court Decision Number: 0257 / Pdt.G / 2021 / PA.Sr) is research that has the purpose of: 1) knowing a reason for the cancellation of marriage and the parties apply for a marriage cancellation; 2) knowing the judge's consideration in providing evidence as well as a decision regarding the cancellation of a marriage; and 3) knowing the legal consequences of a marriage annulment. As for the results of the research, it was found that the reasons put forward by the parties in the cancellation of the marriage were that the marriage was based on the element of fraud, in which case fraud was intended because of identity forgery. Whereas the falsification of identity was carried out by the Respondent when he married the Petitioner, in which in this study the cancellation of the marriage was submitted by the Petitioner (wife). In addition to this regarding the legal considerations of the judge based on the results of the research taken from the excerpt of the proof of evidence until the verdict, it was found that there were two pieces of evidence (written / written evidence and witness evidence) while from the evidence, the judge decided to grant the petition. The Petitioner at the same time cancels the marriage between the Respondent and the Petitioner. This results in a legal action which has "legal consequences" that the cancellation of the marriage becomes null and void against the husband and wife, and from this it does not apply retroactively to the children born in the marriage, as well as the assets acquired during the marriage.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | identity fraud, judge consideration, cancellation request |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | SYANAZ TIFANABILA |
Date Deposited: | 10 Jun 2021 00:57 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jun 2021 00:57 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/91451 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |