Analisis Yuridis Fintech Dalam Perjanjian Peminjaman Dana Perspektif Hukum Perdata

Tinindra, Diniyosa Arteriovani and -, Septarina Budiwati, S.H., M.H., C.N. (2020) Analisis Yuridis Fintech Dalam Perjanjian Peminjaman Dana Perspektif Hukum Perdata. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (633kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (810kB)
	PDF (Bab I) BAB I.pdf Download (223kB)
	PDF (Bab II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (267kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (199kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (156kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (154kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (186kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The objectives of this study are: a) to determine the legal construction of fintech lending in online fund lending agreements from a civil law perspective; b) to find out the legal responsibilities of the parties in peer to peer fintech lending. The approach method used in this research is the normative method with the type of research used is descriptive. The research results obtained are the legal construction of the fintech lending agreement based on the accordane with the Article 1320 of the Civil Code, including 4 (four conditions), namely; a) There is an agreement between the two parties; b) The ability to take legal actions; c) The existence of a certain thing; d) There is a cause that is lawful. Article 1338 of the Civil Code. Based on the results of research on the legal responsibility of the parties in peer to peer fintech lending, it is carried out based on Bank Indonesia circular letter No. 18/22 / DKSP dated 27 September 2016 concerning the Implementation of Digital Financial Services (LKD). If the parties default in this case in the form of; a) the event of Default: Any event or condition determined; b) Payment Failure; c) Other obligations A does not comply with any provisions in the Transaction Document; d) Statement of Not True; e) Cross default; f) Invalidity: (1) The implementation of obligations based on the Transaction Document is invalid, deemed invalid or invalid.g) Changes that bring material loss; h) Destruction of Collateral.

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Fintech Agreement, Fintech Legal Basis, Fintech Legal Protection
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	DINIYOSA ARTERIOVANI TININDRA
Date Deposited:	17 Nov 2020 06:18
Last Modified:	17 Nov 2020 06:18
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/87482

Actions (login required)

View Item