Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi Pada Perjanjian Utang-Piutang Untuk Modal Usaha Antar Rekan Kerja(Studi Kasus: di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta)

Fauziah Rochmawati, Neno and , (Nuswardhani, S.H., S.U,) (2020) Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi Pada Perjanjian Utang-Piutang Untuk Modal Usaha Antar Rekan Kerja(Studi Kasus: di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta). Skripsi thesis, universitas muhammadiyah surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (402kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanpestasi.pdf Download (623kB)
	PDF (Bab I) BAB I.pdf Download (285kB)
	PDF (Bab II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (308kB)
	PDF (Bab III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (521kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (113kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (176kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan) SURAT PERNYATAAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (216kB)

Abstract

Abstract These debt agreements are made by creditor and debtor, where both parties are partners. In this case the debtor owes a sum of money to the creditor to be used as venture capital. However, the Debtor within the predetermined time period cannot repay the debt, causing the creditor to incur losses. For this reason, the creditor submits a claim to the District Court on the basis that the Debtor has defaulted. Thus the purpose of the research conducted by the author is to find out the Process of Settlement of Default Cases for Debt-Receivable Agreements between Business Partners for Business Capital starting from determining the evidence, judges' considerations in deciding cases, and the legal consequences. The method of approach in this study uses the normative method, because in this study the study is the principles, norms, legal principles, legal aspects, in the settlement of default cases in a debt agreement. The type of research the author applies is descriptive research, this research which reveals a problem and the situation as it is, so it is a disclosure of legal facts. Then the result of this research is a debt-receivable agreement is an agreement where one party gives a certain amount of goods on condition that the other party pays back the goods with the agreed amount. The contents of this debt agreement are denied by the Debtor which causes the creditor to suffer losses so that the claim is filed with the District Court and the Debtor is declared default by the judge. Where the Plaintiff in the arguments of his lawsuit can prove so that it has been proven, while Defendant I cannot prove the arguments of Defendant I and the Defendants II and III are declared not to have defaulted because the Defendants II and Defendant III are only asked to help show the assets of Defendants I and the Defendants II and III are declared not to have defaulted because the Co-Defendants II and Defendant III are only asked to help show the assets of Defendant I and the Defendants II and III are declared not to have defaulted because the Co-Defendants II and Defendant III are only asked to help show the assets of Defendant I and the Defendants II and III. in which Defendant II and Defendant III are the holders of guarantee of land rights owned by Defendant I, the judge has decided to grant part of the Plaintiff's claim and decide on the confiscation of equality. The legal consequence of this case was that Defendant I was declared in default and had to pay debts to the Plaintiff, and the judge decided on confiscation of equality. Keywords : debts, default, case settlement in the district court

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	debts, default, case settlement in the district court
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	NENO FAUZIAH ROCHMAWATI
Date Deposited:	18 Nov 2019 02:45
Last Modified:	18 Nov 2019 02:47
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/78809

Actions (login required)

View Item