Tinjauan Yuridis Lelang Barang Jaminan Sebelum Jatuh Tempo Tanpa Sepengetahuan Pemilik (Studi Putusan NO. 05/PDT.G/2016/PN.SKH)

Hanif, Lathifah and , Darsono, S.H., M.H. (2018) Tinjauan Yuridis Lelang Barang Jaminan Sebelum Jatuh Tempo Tanpa Sepengetahuan Pemilik (Studi Putusan NO. 05/PDT.G/2016/PN.SKH). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI) NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (467kB)
	PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN) HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (1MB)
	PDF (BAB I) BAB I.pdf Download (103kB)
	PDF (BAB II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (505kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (BAB III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (477kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (BAB IV) bab IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (90kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (118kB)
	PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI) PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (99kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This dispute is related to the review of the auction procedure for the guarantee goods where previously the plaintiffs have entered into a credit agreement with the defendant with the guarantee of a property certificate number 2849 and number 24. Whereas on the credit agreement, the plaintiffs have suffered congestion in fulfill the agreement so that they cant repay their debts, the object to be disputed object will be sold by auction. The sale of land and building auction to the object of the dispute according to the plaintiff is legally flawed, because prior to be second auction announcement of mortgage execution, the plaintiff is not given a letter of invitation from the District Court to know exactly how much obligation to pay. A legal certainty of the plaintiffs must be addressed of aanmaning by the District Court. The purpose of this paper is to explain the validity of the auction execution of guarantee goods by PT BRI based on Civil Code and Law of the Mortgage and to explain the judge’s consideration in deciding the dispute over the execution of the pledge of credit collateral owned by the Plaintiff. In this study the author uses the method of doctrinal law research conducted by examining the library materials. The verdict used in this study is the Verdict Number 05/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Skh. Type of this research is descriptive research

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	guarantee goods auction, mortgage, auction, judge consideration
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	LATHIFAH HANIF
Date Deposited:	09 Feb 2018 08:58
Last Modified:	09 Feb 2018 08:58
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/60014

Actions (login required)

View Item