Tinjauan Yuridis Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Utang Piutang(Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta)

Prasetyo, Iwan and , Inayah S.H., M.H. (2017) Tinjauan Yuridis Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Utang Piutang(Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (716kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (732kB)
	PDF (Bab I) BAB I.pdf Download (269kB)
	PDF (Bab II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (337kB)
	PDF (Bab III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (383kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (103kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (82kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi Ilmiah) SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (272kB)

Abstract

The loan agreements are included in this type of loan and lending agreement. Debts are agreements between one party and the other and the contracted object is generally money, in the sense that it gives an obligation to the debtor to return what it has received under the same conditions / amount and where necessary can be burdened with interest . A sum of money given by creditors needs to be protected. Without protection, creditors find it difficult to avoid future risks, as a result of non-performing debtors. Events that occur in the implementation of debt agreements often do not run smoothly in accordance with what has been agreed. The Borrower is deemed to have breached the agreement of the agreed debts. This research uses descriptive normative method with primary and secondary data. The data was collected through literature study, field study, and interview with qualitative data analysis. Based on the research result and discussion, it can be concluded that: Legal liability occurred against the breach of contract. The debtor was sued to pay the loss because debtor failed to fulfill his or her obligation as described in the contract. Panel of judges have acquired facts and concluded that this case is indeed breach of contract in loan agreement. Judges have thrown verdict which declared that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff; Declared according to the law that the plaintiff has breached the agreement; Punished the defendant to pay the debt to the plaintiff in cash and all at once.

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	loan agreement, breach of contract settlement, legal liability
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	Iwan Prasetyo
Date Deposited:	24 Oct 2017 06:16
Last Modified:	24 Oct 2017 06:16
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/56460

Actions (login required)

View Item