Perbandingan Hukum Fiqh MTA dengan 4 Madzhab

SARWO AJI WIBOWO, BANGUN and , Dr. Muinudinillah Bashri and , Dr. Muhammad Abdul Khaliq Hasan (2017) Perbandingan Hukum Fiqh MTA dengan 4 Madzhab. Thesis thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

[img] PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf

Download (938kB)
[img] PDF (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf

Download (495kB)
[img] PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (967kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (607kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (BAB V)
BAB V.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (281kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (634kB)
[img] PDF (LAMPIRAN)
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (163kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (SURAT PERNYATAAN)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (70kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf

Download (1MB)

Abstract

This thesis The thesis discusses the study and the comparison between the fiqh laws by MTA and the four religious sects that have been admitted by Islam. The major reason why the author does the study is because the existence of MTA as religious missionary endeavor, educational and social foundation. The influence of MTA with its tafseer (interpretation) method and also its strong fiqh statements in the community. Some of the fiqh statements by MTA need to be re-analyzed/re-examined, since the statements are not in the right line to the four legal Islamic sects, or, the statements are made based on the weak sect’s statements, or, even more, it is made from really weak of sect’s statement, it is not based on the legalized Istidlal (methodology in making a statement). The author makes the limitations of the study that is only about the fiqh statements by MTA with a faith that the mistaken statements by MTA can be analyzed clearly. The questions that the author wants to find out are: (1) what are the fiqh statements of MTA that must be re-analyzed? (2) What is relied upon the MTA in getting the statements? (3) And, How are the four sects, Is there any similarity of appropriateness between the fiqh statement by MTA and the four sects?. The answer of those questions is the objective of the author to do the study. The methodology of the research is explorative analytical. The author explores the fiqh statements by MTA and the fiqh laws by the four sects, and analyzes it. The materials are taken from MTA brochures from 1995-2015 editions, the literatures, the recordings of audio and video, books of fiqh, both classic and contemporary, academic discussion that is related to the topic. The author also uses comparative method, that is comparing the fiqh statements by MTA and fiqh statements of four sects to find out whether it is appropriate or not, not only in it law but also its methodology in taking the statement. The conclusion of the thesis is that the basic law used by the MTA is Al-Quran, sunnah, Ijma, and qiyas. But according to MTA, ijma and qiyas are only used for earth life (custom and social life/human interaction), they are not used in worshipping (to Allah). Even more, some of the fiqh statements by MTA concerning to the fiqh statement matters seemed peculiar to the four sects, e.g: it is fine to have tayamum even though there is water around, it is an obligation for women to have Friday praying at home, etc. There is also that the statements are taken from a very weak among fiqh experts/ jurists, and its impact is so bad to be implemented in the real life for example: a statement about forbidding any kind of food, but based on the prophecy hadith, it is makhruh. But still, of course, there are still the right statements which still in right away with the fiqh statements of four sects. Keywords: MTA, Fiqh statemets, legal Islamic four sects.

Item Type: Thesis (Thesis)
Uncontrolled Keywords: MTA, Hukum Fiqh,4 Madzhab
Subjects: B Philosophy (General); Religion > BA Islam > BA5 Islamic Fiqh
B Philosophy (General); Religion > BP Bahaism. Theosophy, etc
Divisions: Fakultas Agama Islam > Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (HES)
Depositing User: Unnamed user with username o000090036
Date Deposited: 14 Aug 2018 09:25
Last Modified: 05 Oct 2022 06:09
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/55775

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item