Kurniawati, Wibrika and , Dr. Sumardi, M.Si (2017) Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Menurut Polya Dalam Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir Gregorc Siswa Kelas Vii Smp Negeri 1 Gondang Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI REVISI FIX.pdf Download (292kB) |
|
PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
HALAMAN DEPAN REVISI.pdf Download (283kB) |
|
PDF (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf Download (39kB) |
|
PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (63kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (40kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (573kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (BAB V)
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (25kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (34kB) |
|
PDF (LAMPIRAN)
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (72kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
This study aims to describe the problem solving skill of students in terms of thinking style with a category quential concrete, sequential abstract, random concrete and random abstract with the model of problem based learning. This type of research is qualitative. The subject of research are one students for each style. The technique of data collection of research are questionnaire, test and interviews. The data analyze of research are data reduction, data presentation and get conclusion and verification. The results showed that: (1) Students of sequential concrete, understand the problem by writing what is know and ask as well as speak it by following the information in question without analyzing, only able to make one settlement plan, able to write a complete processing step and rechecking the answers. (2) Students of sequential abstract, understand the problem doesn’t write what is known and asked as well as speak it by analyzing using his own words, able to make more than one settlement plan, able to write a complete processing step and rechecking the answers. (3) Students of random concrete, understand the problem by writing what is know and ask as well as speak it by following the information in question without analyzing, only able to make one settlement plan, inclined to be less complete to write processing step and doesn’t check back after completion of work. (4) Students of random abstract, understand the problem doesn’t write what is known and asked as well as speak it by analyzing using his own words, able to make more than one settlement plan, able to write a complete processing step and rechecking the answers.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Gaya Berpikir Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Problem Based Learning |
Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Matematika |
Depositing User: | WIBRIKA KURNIAWATI |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jul 2017 11:27 |
Last Modified: | 21 Jul 2017 11:27 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/53580 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |