Kamila, Aisyah and , Dr. Erma Setiawati, MM.,CA (2016) Pengaruh Sektor Pariwisata, Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (Pdrb), Tingkat Investasi Dan Jumlah Penduduk Terhadap Peningkatan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (Pad) Tahun 2010-2014 (Studi Kasus Kabupaten/Kota Eks Karesidenan Surakarta). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](http://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI r.pdf Download (745kB) |
|
PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
HALAMAN DEPAN E.pdf Download (605kB) |
|
PDF (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf Download (33kB) |
|
PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (111kB) |
|
PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (106kB) |
|
PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (141kB) |
|
PDF (BAB V)
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (14kB) |
|
PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (19kB) |
|
PDF (LAMPIRAN)
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (213kB) |
Abstract
Intention of this research is to know and analyses influence of tourism sector, gross regional of domestic product (PDRB), investment level, amount of resident to make-up of earnings of area genuine (PAD) inex region of Karesidenan Surakarta. This research use quantitative method by using data of secondary obtained of statistical center body (BPS) and also relevant institutions. Population in this research is all sub-province/city of ex region of Karesidenan Surakarta. Amount of sample in this research is seven of area during five year. Method gathering of sample used purposive sampling technique. Used analyzer which covering of normality test, multycolinierity test, heteroskedastisity test, doubled linear regression analyses, F test, determinescoefficient of R2 test, and t test. Pursuant to result of data analysis can be concluded that tourism sector variable do not have an effect on to earnings of area genuine, because tcalculated (- 1,185) < ttable (2,045) with level of significant equal to 0,245 > (0,05). While gross regional of domestic product variable have an effect on to earnings of area genuine, because tcalculated (2,569) > ttable (2,045) with level of significant equal to 0,015 < (0,05). Then at mount investment level variable have an effect on to earnings of area genuine, because tcalculated (2,561) > ttable (2,045) with level of significant equal to 0,016 < (0,05). Hereinafter the amount of resident have an effect on to earnings of area genuine, because tcalculated (- 2,371) >ttable (2,045) with level of significant equal to 0,041 < (0,05). And so it is with test accuracy of model (simultan) show result of statistical test of distribution of Fcalculated> Ftable that is 21,216 > 2,55 with value probability smaller than level of significance research of 5%, that is equal to 0,000. Adjusted R2 equal to its 0,704 meaning of tourism sector, gross regional of domestic product, investment level and resident amount can explain earnings of area genuine variability equal to 70,4%.
| Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Tourism sector, gross regional of domestic product, investment level, amount of resident, earnings of area genuine. |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis > Akuntansi |
| Depositing User: | AISYAH KAMILA |
| Date Deposited: | 04 May 2016 02:51 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2016 11:36 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/43420 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
