Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (Studi kasus Putusan Pidana Nomor: 2/PID.SUS-Anak/2014/PN.Kln)

Ardianto, Feri and , Hartanto, S.H., M.Hum and , Bambang Sukoco S.H.,M.H. (2016) Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (Studi kasus Putusan Pidana Nomor: 2/PID.SUS-Anak/2014/PN.Kln). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

[img] PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf

Download (368kB)
[img] PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf

Download (806kB)
[img] PDF (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf

Download (222kB)
[img] PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (334kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (440kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (100kB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (94kB)
[img] PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (226kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The purpose of this study to know the implementation of elements of Section 363 subsection (1) 4th Criminal Code on criminal offenses of theft with the circumstances aggravating done by children and to know the basic legal considerations the judge in deciding the criminal case of theft with the circumstances aggravating done by children, The method used is descriptive-analytic, with normative juridical approach. The data source consists of primary data and secondary data including primary legal materials, secondary, tertiary. Data were collected by literature study, then analyzed by qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the application of material criminal law against theft by state burdensome, namely Article 363 paragraph (1) 4th Criminal Code in accordance with the facts of the law, both the statements of witnesses, expert testimonies and information from the defendant, only in the application of sanctions the principle of restorative justice here is not used by the judge, so it is not in accordance with Article 5 (1) of Law Number 11 Year 2012 on Child Criminal Justice System. While the basic legal consideration of judges in deciding the case based on Article 193 paragraph (2) b in conjunction with Article 21 paragraph (4) Criminal Procedure Code, Article 194 Criminal Procedure Code and Article 22 paragraph (4) Criminal Procedure Code.

Item Type: Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: the crime of theft, protection of children, the Child Criminal Justice
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User: FERI ARDIANTO
Date Deposited: 19 Feb 2016 01:35
Last Modified: 15 Mar 2017 11:52
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/42003

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item