Pratikayani, Arifah and , Drs. Agus Wijayanto M.A., Ph.D. and , Dra. Siti Zuhriah Ariatmi, M.Hum (2014) Representative Utterances In “Qomik Quran Juz 9”. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](http://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
FRONT_PAGE.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
|
PDF (Bab I)
CHAPTER_I.pdf Download (33kB) |
|
|
PDF (Bab II)
CHAPTER_II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (109kB) |
|
|
PDF (Bab III)
CHAPTER_III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (18kB) |
|
|
PDF (Bab IV)
CHAPTER_IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (303kB) |
|
|
PDF (Bab V)
CHAPTER_V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (19kB) |
|
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf Download (17kB) |
|
|
PDF (Lampiran)
APPENDIX.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
|
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
PUBLICATION_ARTICLE.pdf Download (601kB) |
Abstract
The aim of this study is to describe the pragmalinguistics form and the illocutionary acts of representative utterances used in Qomik Quran Juz 9 comic by Edusarana 2005. This study uses descriptive qualitative method. The data were written text of representative utterance used in Qomik Quran Juz 9 by Edusarana 20115. The data of pragmalinguistics form were analyzed by Anna Trosborg and the illocutionary acts were analyzed by Austin’s theory also added by Kreidler’s theory as the types of representative utterances. The research findings showed that the pragmalinguistics form are downgraders: downtoners 5 data or 7,4%, understaters 1 datum or 1,5%, hedges 2 data or 2,9 %, subjectivizers 3 data or 4,4%, cajolers 4 data or 5,9%, and appealers 2 data or 2,9%; and upgraders: adjective intensifier 1 datum or 1,5 %, adverbial intensifier 21 data or 30,9%, commitment upgraders 23 data or 33,8%, lexical intensification 5 data or 7,4%, and do-instruction 1 datum or 1,5%. The intentions of them are based on the types of representative utterance, namely focus on information: announcing 6 data or 8,8%, declaring 10 data or 14,7%, disclosing 1 datum or 1,5% , explaining 12 data or 17,6%, expressing of boast 1 datum or 1,5%, expressing of getting angry 1 datum or 1,5%, expressing of need a help 1 datum or 1,5%, expressing of worry 1 datum or 1,5%, expressing of proud 1 datum or 1,5%, mentioning 6 data or 7,4%, proclaiming 2 data or 2,9%, relating 1 datum or 1,5%; focus on truth-value of utterance: affirming 8 data or 11,8% and asserting 3 data or 4,4%; focus on speaker’s commitment/ involvement in what is reported: confiding 1 datum or 1,5% and professing 2 data or 2,9%; focus on manner of communicating: hinting 2 data or 2,9%, implying 2 data or 2,9%, and intimating 2 data or 2,9%; focus on the nature of message: dictating 1 datum or 1,5%; and focus on aspect: predicting 1 datum or 1,5% and recalling 3 data or 4,4%.
| Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | pragmatics, speech act, representative utterance, pragmalinguistics form |
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > PE English |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris |
| Depositing User: | Maria Husnun Nisa |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2014 12:56 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Oct 2021 10:48 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/29477 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
