A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ARTICULATING ENGLISH REGRESSIVE ASSIMILATION [N] AND ARABIC “NUN SAKINAH” LAW IN “TAHSIN” RULES BY THE STUDENTS OF MU’ALLIMAT PROGRAM IN PONPES AL-MUKMIN NGRUKI – SUKOHARJO

Susiati, Susiati (2008) A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ARTICULATING ENGLISH REGRESSIVE ASSIMILATION [N] AND ARABIC “NUN SAKINAH” LAW IN “TAHSIN” RULES BY THE STUDENTS OF MU’ALLIMAT PROGRAM IN PONPES AL-MUKMIN NGRUKI – SUKOHARJO. Skripsi thesis, Universutas Muhammadiyah Surakarta .

[img]
Preview
PDF
A320040323.pdf

Download (1MB)
[img] PDF
A320040323.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB)

Abstract

The study aims 1) to identify the similarities and differences between English and Arabic with “tahsin” rules based on the place of articulation and 2) to describe how the students of Mu’allimat program pronounce regressive assimilation [n] in English. This study is limited on English consonant sounds and Arabic “nun sakinah” [�] law in “tahsin” rules. This is a qualitative study in which the object is English regressive assimilation [n] and Arabic “nun sakinah” law in “tahsin rules produced by the students of Mu’allimat program in PONPES Al-Mukmin Ngruki-Sukoharjo viewed from phonologically conditioned. The data source consists of primary data and secondary data. The primary data is the students of Mu’allimat program in PONPES Al Mukmin Ngruki – Sukoharjo having “tahsin” background. The secondary data is English consonants and regressive assimilation [n] and also Arabic “nun sakinah” law in “tahsin” rules. The other secondary data is an English text book including phrases that contain regressive assimilation [n] entitled Developing Skills (an integrated course for intermediate students by L.G. Alexander, 1975). The method of collecting data used is recording. The technique of data analysis is contrastive analysis and in-dept interview. The results of this study show that 1) there are similarities and differences between English consonant sounds and Arabic with “tahsin” rules based on the place of articulation. The similarities are 17 consisting of [b] and [�], [t] and [�], [d] and [�], [k] and [�], [dЗ] and [ج], [f] and [�], [θ] and [�], [ð] and [�], [s] and [�], [z] and [ز], [З] and [�], [h] and [ه], [m] and [م], [n] and [�], [l] and [], [r] and [�], and [w] and [و]. The differences are 7 consisting [p], [g], [t∫], [v], [∫], [j], and [ŋ] in English and 10 consisting of [خ], [ح], [�], [�], [�], [�], [ع], [غ], [ي] and [�] in Arabic. 2) The students of Mu’allimat program belonging to khalaqoh tahsinul qur’an don’t always pronounce English regressive assimilation [n] correctly, and the students of Mu’allimat program not belonging to khalaqoh tahsinul qur’an don’t always pronounce English regressive assimilation [n] uncorrectly.

Item Type: Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: regressive assimilation [n] and Arabic “nun sakinah”, pronounce regressive assimilation
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: Ari Fatmawati
Date Deposited: 14 Apr 2009 03:51
Last Modified: 01 Feb 2011 04:59
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/1109

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item