soadikin, ahmad and , Andri Nirwana, AN, S.TH, M.Ag, Ph.D (2023) Komparasi Kitab Tafsir Tokoh Muhammadiyah Dalam Metode Dan Coraknya (Studi Kitab Tafsir Al-hidayah, Tafsir Sinar, Dan Tafsir Qur'an An-nur). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](http://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (424kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (588kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (301kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (938kB) |
|
PDF (Bab V)
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (372kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (497kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
pernyataan publikasi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (923kB) |
|
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI .pdf Download (648kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (821kB) |
Abstract
Tafsir Muqarran (comparison), is a method used to compare interpretations which attempts to explain the directions and tendencies of each mufassir in interpreting the Qur'an, analyzes the background factors of a mufassir and analyzes the directions and tendencies of the mufassir. In this way, it is intended to be able to find interpreters who are influenced by certain sources, methods and patterns of interpretation as well as differences in schools of thought in their interpretation. In this study, the ideally formulated problem is that the interpreter should have sources, methods and patterns in his interpretation. However, there are many books of interpretation whose sources, methods and styles are not mentioned in the muqaddimah of the book of interpretation. So that the reader needs a separate study to reveal the sources, methods and patterns of interpretation of a book of interpretation. Researchers used qualitative methods (library research). Qualitative research is also called naturalistic research because the nature of the data collected is qualitative, not quantitative because it does not use measuring devices. In this study, the researcher focused on the object of study on the book of commentary al-Hidayah, Tafsir Sinar and Book of Tafsir an-Nur, each of which was written by a Muhammadiyah figure. Nevertheless, the three commentaries have different sources, styles and methods, in which the interpretation of al-Hidayah takes its sources from the book of interpretations written by Muhammad abduh, al-Maraghy and al-Qasimiy, the interpretation of al-Hidayah uses the izdiwajiy method in compiling the book his interpretation so that this interpretation has the character of ijtihadi even though it is not the result of pure ijtihad of the author of the book of interpretations. Tafsir Sinar takes sources from the Koran, hadith, qaul companions and tabi'in and uses 3 methods of interpretation namely Bi al-ma'tsur, Bi al-ra'yi and Bi al-iqtirany, this interpretation is adab al- ijtima'i (social community). And the last one is the book of interpretation of an-Nur whose source is almost the same as the interpretation of Sinar, the difference is in the method and style. Tafsir an-Nur does not use any of the existing interpretation methods but Hasbi is more adaptive and flexible depending on the context of discussion of a verse in the Qur'an so that this interpretation is general. Keywords: Muhammadiyah interpretation, sources, methods, style
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Muhammadiyah interpretation, sources, methods, style |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy (General); Religion > BA Islam > BA13 Ilmu Tafsir |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Agama Islam > Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir |
| Depositing User: | AHMAD SOADIKIN |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Feb 2023 01:31 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Feb 2023 01:31 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/109343 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
