Kusumawati, Iswari Nanda and , Drs. Saifudin, M.Ag. (2023) Makna Wailun Li Al-Muṭaffifīn Dalam Surah Al-Muṭaffifīn (Studi Komparatif Tafsir Ibnu Kaṡīr Dan Al-Miṣbāḥ). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
Naskah Publikasi-3.pdf Download (769kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
MOTTO skripsi_merged.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (226kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (396kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (178kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (509kB) |
|
PDF (Bab V)
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (143kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (172kB) |
|
PDF (Lampiran)
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (104kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
Abstract
This study aims to compare how M. Quraiṣ Ṣihab and Ibnu Kaṡīr interpret wailun li al-muṭaffifīn. In their interpretation, of course the two commentators have differences and similarities both in terms of method and interpretation. This research is a type of library research, with a comparative method, namely comparing Ibnu Kaṡīr and M. Quraiṣ Ṣihab in interpreting QS. Al-Muṭaffifīn. In addition, the writer will analyze the differences and similarities between the two commentators. In this study, the data collection technique used by researchers is documentation. By collecting various data in the form of notes, articles, books, journals and other documents related to this research. The collected data is selected into primary and secondary data which then from the results of the classification will be analyzed using descriptive writing techniques and provide conclusions on the results of the analysis regarding the similarities and differences in the interpretations of the two commentators studied. The results of this study indicate that there are similarities and differences between Ibnu Kaṡīr and M. Quraiṣ Ṣihab both in terms of method and interpretation. The difference in interpretation cannot be separated from the scientific background and environment of each interpreter. Ibnu Kaṡīr does not explicitly explain the characteristics of people who cheat in measuring and weighing (al-muṭaffīf). According to him, a cheater is anyone who acts arbitrarily in terms of measures and weights, whether considering rights and obligations or otherwise. But he explained the threats in the afterlife for those who cheat in depth by presenting hadith narrations. Meanwhile, M. Quraiṣ Ṣihab's interpretation of the word Muṭaffifīn is more focused on trade interactions.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Cheating, QS. Al-Mutaffifin, Tafsir Ibnu Kaṡīr, Tafsir Al-Miṣbāḥ |
Subjects: | B Philosophy (General); Religion > BA Islam > BA13 Ilmu Tafsir L Education > L Education (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Agama Islam > Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir |
Depositing User: | ISWARI NANDA KUSUMAWATI |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jan 2023 09:09 |
Last Modified: | 29 Jan 2023 09:09 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/107236 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |