An Error Analyis on Written Production Made by EFL Students of International Program of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta

Suhono, Suhono and , Dr. Dwi Haryanti, M.Hum and , Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D (2015) An Error Analyis on Written Production Made by EFL Students of International Program of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Thesis thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) Artikel Publikasi Ilmiah.pdf Download (363kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) Halaman Depan.pdf Download (492kB)
	PDF (Bab I) CHAPTER I.pdf Download (34kB)
	PDF (Bab II) CHAPTER II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (159kB)
	PDF (Bab III) CHAPTER III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (15kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) CHAPTER IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (304kB)
	PDF (Bab V) CHAPTER V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (32kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (18kB)
	PDF (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (62kB)
	PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi Ilmiah) Surat Pernyataan Publikasi Ilmiah.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (706kB)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop further analyzing of error analysis in second language learners of international program of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. The researcher explored the type of grammatical errors made by students at different proficiency levels: high, medium, and low level. More specifically, this study was an attempt to describe the type of grammatical error which frequently exist in written production, to describe frequency grammatical error among proficiency levels, and to describe the students’ understanding of errors. Students’ writings were analyzed for errors based on surface strategy taxonomy. The results of this research revealed that 846 sentences indicated errors. Types of omission error was the highest one 322 (37.9%) sentences. Afterward, grammatical error in low proficiency level was the highest one 322 (37.9%) sentences. The second was high proficiency level 276 (32.6%) sentences. The third was medium proficiency level 248 (29.3%) sentences. Most of the students didn’t understand about grammatical errors, because through 30 students’ interview only 7 students were able to change grammatical error to be good sentences.

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Thesis)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Error Analysis, Students of International Program of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Subjects:	L Education > LB Theory and practice of education P Language and Literature > PR English literature
Divisions:	Fakultas Pasca Sarjana > Magister Pengkajian Bahasa
Depositing User:	Suhono
Date Deposited:	20 Oct 2015 07:50
Last Modified:	12 Oct 2021 03:16
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/37938

Actions (login required)

View Item