Ardinata, Surya and , Dr. Rizka, S.Ag., M.H (2020) Analisi Legalitas Akad Pembiyaan Murabahah Tanpa Notaris (Studi Putusan Nomor 165/Pdt/G/2018/ PA.Wng). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (515kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (469kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (234kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (346kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (268kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (160kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (209kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (193kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The objectives of this research are: a) to find out the provisions of murabahah financing agreements without a notary that are applied by financial institutions; b) to find out the factors and constraints in the murabahah contract financing agreement without a notary. The method used in this research is the normative method. This type of research is descriptive. The research results obtained are agreements made by the Plaintiff and Defendant when viewed from the general requirements that have been fulfilled, namely: a) Both people who do aqad are capable of acting (experts); b) The object of the contract can accept the law; c) The contract is permitted by syara '; d) Aqad is not prohibited by syara '; e) Aqad can provide benefits; f) The consent goes on; g) Ijab and qabul are continued if they separate before there is a qabul then it is canceled The agreement made by the Plaintiff and Defendant is seen from the relationship between the parties contained in the Murabahah Financing Agreement, which is a legal relationship that can have certain legal consequences. Factors and constraints in the murabahah financing agreement without a notary are: a) in the event of a dispute the plaintiff can include in the petitum this lawsuit intentionally mixing up a mixture of criminal and civil cases. with the case of a request to sentence with imprisonment, a hypothesis can be made that the religious court is not authorized to hear cases;c) based on the Ammar lawsuit the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter d of the Law are submitted. No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law NO. 30 of 2004 Position; d) when signing a credit agreement.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | murabahah agreement, murabaha legal regulations, murabahah treaty dispute settlement |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | SURYA ARDINATA |
Date Deposited: | 19 Apr 2021 03:00 |
Last Modified: | 19 Apr 2021 03:01 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/90591 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |