Maisaroh, Marisa Iffah and , Nuswardhani, S.H., S.U (2019) Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi terhadap Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah Milik Pihak Ketiga (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Klaten). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![]() |
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (826kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (378kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (284kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (370kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (334kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (102kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (205kB) |
![]() |
PDF (Surat Pernyataan)
SURAT PERNYATAAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (190kB) |
Abstract
Abstract A Credit Agreement is a contract made between a Creditor and the Debtor with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties. Debtor fail to repay the loan so Creditor got some tort then submits a claim to the District Court on the basic of Default in a Credit Agreement with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties. Therefore this research by the writer aims to knows Process Finishing the Case to a Default as a Credit Agreement with Land Right as Collateral owned by third parties start from decides verification, Judge comparation in order to decides the case then Law Caused. This research uses a normative approach caused is examined rule by the law in a Process Finishing the Case to a Default, legal principles or legal doctrins on the basic of a consideration until the core of logic Verdict.The type of this research applying descriptive research, because a study types about describing a law events or a law condition. The result of this study is a Credit Agreement constitute a Credit which is the participant give an object with a same quantity. The point from Credit Agreement was disavowed by a Debtor then Creditor submit sue to the District Court and Debtor is stated by Judge. The Plaintiffcan prove the arguments of the Claim so it can be proven. Meanwhile, Defendant I and Defendant II can not prove the arguments and Defendant III were not proven as a Default because Defendant III was Collateral owner which is used by Defendant I and Defendant II to do a Credit Agreementso the Judge decides cut off to grant a half from the Plaintiff Claim. Law Caused by this case are the Defendant I and the Defendant II is stated Default and must indemnify in concurrent and pay the cost case. Key Word : credit agreement case, default, finishing the case in the district court
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | credit agreement case, default, finishing the case in the district court |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | MARISA IFFAH MAISAROH |
Date Deposited: | 18 Nov 2019 02:41 |
Last Modified: | 18 Nov 2019 02:41 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/78810 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |