AN ANALYSIS OF TYPE AND PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN STUDENTS’ WRITING TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 6 SURAKARTA

KUSUMANINGTIAS, DESTIE and -, Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum (2018) AN ANALYSIS OF TYPE AND PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN STUDENTS’ WRITING TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 6 SURAKARTA. Skripsi thesis, UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA.

BACA FULLTEXT
[img] PDF (Front Page)
FRONTPAGE.pdf
Download (734kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter I)
CHAPTER I.pdf
Download (211kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter II)
CHAPTER II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (254kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter III)
CHAPTER III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (171kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter V)
CHAPTER V.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (159kB)
[img] PDF (Chapter IV)
CHAPTER IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (808kB)
[img] PDF (Bibliography)
BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf
Download (142kB)
[img] PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi)
PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (291kB)
[img] PDF (Appendix)
APPENDIX.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (1MB)
[img] PDF (Publication Article)
PUBLICATION ARTICLE-1.pdf
Download (819kB)

Abstract

The reserch is about Corrective Feedback Analysis. The aims of this research are: 1) to describe the type of corrective feedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta, 2) to find out the purpose of corrective feedback. The data are taken from Teacher and the Students Second grade of SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta. The Method of collecting data in this research are Observation, Interview, and Students Work. The type of this research is desccriptive qualitative research. The researches identifies the types of corrective feedback by refering Teddick&Gortari theory and Karmin&Ivy theory for describe the function of corrective feedback, then describes the frequency of each type of corrective feedback by using table. The finding showed that the researcher found (42,85%) Repetition, (35,72%) Clarification Feedback, and (21,43%) Elicitation in Oral corrective feedback, while in written corrective feedback there are (72,85%) direct corrective feedback and (27,14%) Indirect corrective feedback. The result showed that there are three kinds of oral corrective fedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta used Clarification feedback, Repetition, and Elicitation. In the written corrective feedback there are two kinds of feedback that used by the teacher, there are Direct and Indirect corrective feedback. The result also show that teacher apply 2 corrective feedback to help in checking students assignment and improving students writing ability.

Item Type: Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Corrective feedback, types of corrective feedback, Writing skill.
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: DESTIE KUSUMANINGTIAS
Date Deposited: 24 May 2018 03:34
Last Modified: 24 May 2018 03:34
URI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/62658

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UMS ETD-db is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.