Az Zahro, Nurul Fatimah and , Dr. Kelik Wardiono, S.H., M.H (2018) Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Pembatalan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Pengadilan Negeri (Studi Putusan Nomor : 293/Pdt.G/BPSK/2014/PN.Bks, 72/Pdt.G.BPSK/2010/PN.Yk, 16/Pdt.Sus.BPSK/2014/PN.Grt). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI-276.pdf Download (489kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (349kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (260kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (193kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (459kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (158kB) | Request a copy |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (147kB) |
|
PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi)
PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (73kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Consumer dispute resolution is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board mandated by Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. This study discusses about the decision of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency, such us DKI Jakarta, Bantul, and Tasikmalaya which is not approved by the Businessman and then submitted a cancellation to State Court Bekasi, Yogyakarta, and Garut. The three of District Court Judges overturned the decision of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board, with the consideration that BPSK is not authorized to resolve consumer disputes. That means, the considerations of the three District Court Judges do not take into account the provisions contained in Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade No. 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001 on the Implementation of Duties and Powers of Consumer Dispute Settlement Bodies, as well as opinions from AZ Nasution related to Consumer Dispute. there is one District Court Judge who has the right consideration to 2 categories of consumer disputes, namely Garut District Court in decision number 16 / Pdt.Sus.BPSK / 2014 / PN.Grt.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Consumer Protection, BPSK, Judge Consideration, Consumer Dispute. |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | NURUL FATIMAH AZ ZAHRO |
Date Deposited: | 05 Apr 2018 01:55 |
Last Modified: | 05 Apr 2018 01:55 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/61176 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |