Analisis Kritis Putusan Nomor 68/G/2012/PTUN-SMG Tentang Izin Lokasi Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Uap Batang

Malik S., Mizan and , Dr. Nuria Siwi Enggaraini, S.H.,M.Hum (2018) Analisis Kritis Putusan Nomor 68/G/2012/PTUN-SMG Tentang Izin Lokasi Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Uap Batang. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (603kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (723kB)
	PDF (Bab I) BAB I.pdf Download (193kB)
	PDF (Bab II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (286kB)
	PDF (Bab III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (299kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (156kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (11kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi Ilmiah) PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (93kB)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe the judge’s decision and the Court Judgment No.68/G/2012/PTUN-SMG. The method used in this study is normative juridical method. It is a descriptive-analytical method where the data are taken from the Court Judgment No.68/G/2012/PTUN-SMG and Appeal Judgment No. 130/B/2013/PT.TUN.SBY. The background of this study is based on the court judgment which used to end the dispute between the suspect parties. On the other hand, it causes a new problem. It can be seen on the court judgment No.68/G/2012/PTUN-SMG where the court judgment has not fulfilled a legal agreement and it contains of the lack of the judge’s judgment. The result of this study shows that the unfulfilled of the legal certainty makes one of the cases conducted by the judge is reported to be contradiction towards the Government Regulation No. 26 year 2008 on National Master Plan jo. In Appendix VIII number 311, it shows that without a hearing of the case makes the implementation of the law enforcement is not run by the judge. The lack of judge’s judgment because of ignoring the regulation that should be a guideline in the settlement of disputes on the Government Regulation No. 26 year 2008 on National Master Plan makes the judge’s judgment become uncompleted for any reasons the agreement of the site construction must be suitable with the valid master plan regulations.

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Court Judgment, Legal Certainty, Judge’s Judgment.
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	MIZAN MALIK S
Date Deposited:	07 Feb 2018 03:28
Last Modified:	07 Feb 2018 03:28
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/59569

Actions (login required)

View Item