Mulyana, Fachri Dohan and , Nuswardhani, S.H, S.U (2017) Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Pembatalan Sepihak Oleh Pembeli Terkait Pembelian Seperangkat Gamelan(Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Karanganyar). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH PUBLIKASI-libraryums-fachri.pdf Download (838kB) |
|
PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (828kB) |
|
PDF (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf Download (221kB) |
|
PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (311kB) |
|
PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (357kB) |
|
PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (164kB) |
|
PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (13kB) |
|
PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (249kB) |
Abstract
This study aims to determine the judge's consideration in determining the verification and determining decisions related to the purchase of a set of gamelan and legal consequences after the decision of the District Court judge related to unilateral cancellation by the buyer associated with the purchase of a set of gamelan. This research uses normative juridical method which is descriptive. Sources of data derived from primary data are interviews and secondary data from primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. Methods of data collection through literature study and field study (observation and interview), then the data were analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research shows that the Defendant has defaulted because in the relation of the gamelan sale agreement as the Agreement Letter dated October 24, 2012, the Defendant as the recipient of the ordering work of 40 sets of Gamelan did not finish the job and did not submit the gamelan as in the a quo agreement. Judge's consideration in determining the decision refers to the validity of the sale and purchase agreement pursuant to Article 1320 Civil Code concerning the Agreement is the Defendant did not finish the work, pursuant to Article 1243 Civil Code the Defendant made a default. As a result of the law after the decision of the District Court Judge is to implement a voluntary verdict, the Defendant shall indemnify him, if he does not want the Plaintiff may file an execution to the District Court to pay compensation.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Case of cancellation of purchase of gamelan, wanprestasi, settlement of case in District Court |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | FACHRI DOHAN MULYANA |
Date Deposited: | 15 Aug 2017 04:25 |
Last Modified: | 15 Aug 2017 04:25 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/55545 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |