Prasetya, Heru and , Budi Priyanto, S.T., M.T. (2016) Evaluasi Kelayakan Investasi Proyek Perumahan Dan Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Perumahan (Studi Kasus : Shapira Town House Paulan Karanganyar). Diploma thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
Naskah Publikasi.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
Halaman Depan.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (295kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (662kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (313kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (Bab V)
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (290kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (134kB) |
|
PDF (Lampiran)
Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (11MB) |
|
PDF (Pernyataan Publikasi Ilmiah)
Surat pernyataan publikasi ilmiah.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (263kB) |
Abstract
Business property provides a greater opportunity in Karanganyar city and surrounding areas. strategic location between major cities such as Solo, Sukoharjo and Boyolali. This it gets the attention of developers who develop residential business was Mr. Santo in development projects Shapira Town House located in the village Paulan, Colomadu sub-district, Karanganyar district. Based on the result of the research budget planning costs (RAB) Shapira Town House residence project that is amounting to Rp 5,513,094,000.00 and the calculation of total sales revenue 24 unnit home Rp 14,038,664,000.00. In terms of economic and financial investment in this project are feasible or viable. The result of the calculation of NPV of Rp 886,280,000.00, the resulting NPV is positive, suggests that the investment is feasible or viable. IRR (Internal Rate of Return) = 26.88%> rate of interest = 12%, so the investment is feasible or deserved. BCR value (Benefit Cost Ratio) = 1.09> 1, so that the investment is feasible or viable. Payback calculations Pariod or long payback investasi on housing projects Shapira Town House for 1 year and 4 months or in the 2nd. From several indicator that accupant or costumers generally is statisfied presentation of statisfaction about price of house reacher (80%) responden were statisfied. The statisfaction of accupant abaut house reacher (81%) responden were statisfied. the statisfaction of accupant about house facillity insfrastructure reacher (83,33%) responden were statisfied. The statisfaction abaut aksesibility of house (30%) responden were statisfied. , (20,50%) responden were not statisfied, and (47,50%) responden were statisfied are in netral and reguler on accessibility from hausing. From variables of statisfaction level the responden have CS calculation value below of CS table value. Whice means there is no signification with variables and the in habitants of small type with the house hold respondent large.
Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Diploma) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | investment feasibility, residence, economic analyze, statisfaction level. |
Subjects: | T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Teknik > Teknik Sipil |
Depositing User: | HERU PRASETYA |
Date Deposited: | 28 Oct 2016 09:42 |
Last Modified: | 28 Oct 2016 09:42 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/47134 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |