A Comparison Between Refusal Strategies In English Made By Indonesian Efl Students And Thailand Efl Students : An Interlanguage Pragmatic Study

Ilmiani, Dwi and , Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D and , Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D (2016) A Comparison Between Refusal Strategies In English Made By Indonesian Efl Students And Thailand Efl Students : An Interlanguage Pragmatic Study. Thesis thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN) 03 HALAMAN DEPAN-DWI.pdf Download (1MB)
	PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI) 02 NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (900kB)
	PDF (HALAMAN JUDUL) 03 HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Download (1MB)
	PDF (CHAPTER I) 04 BAB I.pdf Download (76kB)
	PDF (CHAPTER II) 05 BAB II.pdf Download (205kB)
	PDF (CHAPTER III) 06 BAB III.pdf Download (66kB)
	PDF (CHAPTER IV) 07 BAB IV.pdf Download (460kB)
	PDF (CHAPTER V) 08 BAB V.pdf Download (40kB)
	PDF (BIBLIOGRAPHY) 09 DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (74kB)
	PDF (APPENDIX) 10 APPENDIX.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (313kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI) 01 SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH.pdf Download (74kB)

Abstract

This study deals with refusal strategies in English made by Indonesian EFL students (ILE) and Thailand EFL students (TLE). The aims of this study are (1) to analyze the differences and the similarities between refusal strategies made by both groups, (2) to analyze whether the two groups used similar or difference refusal strategies in social level, (3) and to analyze whether the two groups of speaker use the same or different politeness strategies in their refusals. The subjects of the research are 15 Indonesian EFL students and 15 Thailand EFL students who study at UMS. Refusal strategies to request and suggestion made by the two of groups became the object of this research. The type of this research is descriptive qualitative research. The data for this study is elicited from the respondents through the Discourse Completion Task (DCT) which consisted of six situations with different level status. The data were analyzed by Beebe et al refusal strategy and Brown and Levinson’s politeness strategy. The finding of the study showed that ILE tended to be direct in declining a request and suggestion for examples, inability, unwillingness and direct ‘no’. While TLE tended to employ ‘excuse’ almost in all DCT scenarios. It is also found that most of group participants used combination strategies of politeness in their groups. Key words: interlanguage pragmatic, refusal strategies, politeness strategies

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Thesis)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	DAta,Informatio,Perpustakaan
Subjects:	L Education > L Education (General) P Language and Literature > PE English
Divisions:	Fakultas Pasca Sarjana > Magister Pengkajian Bahasa
Depositing User:	DWI ILMIANI
Date Deposited:	10 May 2016 11:23
Last Modified:	10 May 2016 11:24
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/43814

Actions (login required)

View Item