Errors In Narrative Text Committed By Students In Grade Xi Of Vocational High School (SMK) State 4 Surakarta Academic Year 2014/2015

Mulyono, Eko (2016) Errors In Narrative Text Committed By Students In Grade Xi Of Vocational High School (SMK) State 4 Surakarta Academic Year 2014/2015. Thesis thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) Naskah Publikasi.pdf Download (634kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) Halaman Depan.pdf Download (1MB)
	PDF (BAB 1) BAB 1.pdf Download (388kB)
	PDF (BAB 2) BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (500kB)
	PDF (BAB 3) BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (288kB)
	PDF (BAB 4) BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (736kB)
	PDF (BAB 5) BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (201kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (309kB)
	PDF (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (10MB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan) SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (21kB)

Abstract

Eko Mulyono, S200140053. Errors in Narrative Text Committed by Students in Grade XI of Vocational High School (SMK) State 4 Surakarta Academic Year 2014/2015. Post Graduate Thesis. Graduate Program of Language Studies Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta 2016. This study aimes to identify the types of errors in the students’ writing, to know the frequencies of each type of errors, and to investigate the causes of errors. There are three types of errors occured in the students’ writing namely lexical error, syntactical error, and discourse error. The errors can be categorized into twenty four subcategories of errors: wrong spelling words (10,35%), wrong selection words (15,53%), omission verb (0,74%), omission v-ing after preposition for (0,55%), addition unnecessary verb (0,74%), using simple present tense refers to simple past (22,37%), use simple future instead of past future (2,40%), using irregular past verb tense after to infinitive (2,40%), addition final ed after to infinitive (1,85%), addition v-ing after to infinitive (1,11%), addition double marking verb (1,66%), omission to be (11,65%), addition to be (1,29%), omission s/es in the use of plural noun (2,40%), addition s in singular noun (1,29%), omission article (6,47%), addition unnecessary article (1,66%), wrong article (1,11%), wrong subject pronoun (2,03%), wrong object pronoun (0,55%), wrong possessive pronoun (2,03%), generic structure (2,96%), reference (2,03%), wrong selection conjunction (4,81%). The most dominant error is in syntactical error i.e. using simple present tense refers to simple past with the percentage 22,37%. Those errors are caused by four aspects, they are overgeneralization, incomplete application of rules, ignorance of rule restrictions, and false concept hypothesized. Keywords: error analysis, causes of errors, interlanguage, grammar, writing

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Thesis)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	error analysis, causes of errors, interlanguage, grammar, writing
Subjects:	P Language and Literature > PE English
Divisions:	Fakultas Pasca Sarjana > Magister Pengkajian Bahasa
Depositing User:	Eko Mulyono
Date Deposited:	11 Mar 2016 07:32
Last Modified:	11 Mar 2016 07:32
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/42346

Actions (login required)

View Item