Pertanggungjawaban Kriminal Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa

Herdaetha, Adriesti and , Dr. Natangsa Surbakti, S.H., M.Hum and , Wardah Yuspin, S.H.,M.Kn.,Ph.D. (2015) Pertanggungjawaban Kriminal Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naslah Publikasi) Naskah Publikasi.pdf Download (952kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depanm) Halaman Depan.pdf Download (5MB)
	PDF (Bab I) Bab 1.pdf Download (125kB)
	PDF (BAb II) Bab 2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (227kB)
	PDF (Bab III) Bab 3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (541kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) Bab 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (30kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (56kB)
	PDF (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (140kB)

Abstract

Criminal responsibility is an important factor in criminal offense. Determining a criminal responsibility of people with mental disorders is problematic. Mental disorders affect free will because they can affect one’s ability to determine his or her alternative action. This juridical normative research studied the correlation between mental disorders and criminal behaviors, the criminal responsibility of people with mental disorders, and the settlement of criminal offense done by people with mental disorders at the investigation phase and before the court. Nearly all of mental disorders are related to criminal behaviors because they affect reasoning abilities. According to literatures, the mental condition that is most related to the criminal behaviors is automatisms: hallucination, illusion, and suspicion; impulse control disorders; personality disorders; mental retardation; and substance abuse. On the evaluation of people with mental disorders, there is not solely one formulation applicable to all cases, but the there shall be a case-by-case review. Law and Psychiatrics have different concepts on the mental disorders. Many law enforcement officers regard that all of people with mental disorders cannot be responsible. Law in Indonesia has a responsibility dichotomy, namely: irresponsible or fully responsible. There is a tendency that judges do not regard mental disorders as mitigating factors and do not include the elements of therapy in the verdict for people with mental disorders.

Item Type:	Karya ilmiah (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	criminal responsibility, mental disorders, criminal offense
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Pasca Sarjana > Magister Hukum
Depositing User:	Ari Fatmawati
Date Deposited:	29 Oct 2015 08:10
Last Modified:	11 Oct 2021 13:34
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/38549

Actions (login required)

View Item