Pembuktian Aset Kripto Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Asa, Mohammad Rachman and , Dr. Tasya Panji Nugraha, S.H,M.Н. (2026) Pembuktian Aset Kripto Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) Naskah Publikasi - Mohammad Rachman Asa - C100220229.pdf Download (196kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) haldep.pdf Download (686kB)
	PDF (Bab I) bab1.pdf Download (608kB)
	PDF (Bab II) bab2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (437kB)
	PDF (Bab III) bab3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (414kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) bab4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (317kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) dafpus.pdf Download (239kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) surat pernyataan publikasi- Asa.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (788kB)

Abstract

The development of crypto assets as digital instruments presents new challenges, particularly in proving money laundering. The pseudonymous, cross-border nature of crypto assets, and their use of blockchain technology, complicates the evidentiary process for law enforcement. This study aims to analyze the evidence base for crypto assets in money laundering cases. The approach used in this study is a statutory regulatory approach. The data used in this study is secondary data sourced from primary and secondary legal materials. This study utilizes a literature review. The data analysis method in this study is guided by qualitative methods to generate descriptive analytical information. The results show that proving crypto assets in money laundering crimes can be achieved through crypto asset tracking technology, which can be achieved through digital forensics, on-chain tracking, blockchain explorers, machine learning, unsupervised clustering methods, and deep learning. Proving crypto assets in money laundering crimes can be done by reverse proof as regulated in Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes, specifically Articles 77 and 78, and Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, namely Articles 37 and 38. Article 235 paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code regarding evidence. Article 5 of the Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE) regarding evidence. In cases of money laundering crimes through crypto assets, the burden of proof carried out by the prosecutor and by the defendant must be carried out equally. Cooperation between institutions including PPATK, OJK, KPK, BAPPEBTI, Polri, and the Prosecutor's Office, plays an important role in eradicating TPPU through crypto assets.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Proof, Crypto Assets, Money Laundering
Subjects:	K Law K Law > Indonesia Law
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Politik > S1 Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	MOHAMMAD RACHMAN ASA
Date Deposited:	11 Aug 2026 07:21
Last Modified:	11 Aug 2026 07:21
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/147346

Actions (login required)

View Item