Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Residivis Narkotika

Akesh, Razan Hassan Ahmad Hassan and , Hanifah Febriani, S.H., LL.M. (2026) Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Residivis Narkotika. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) Naskah_Publikasi_Razan Hassan Ahmad Hassan Akesh.pdf Download (186kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) Halaman depan_SKRIPSI_RAZAN HASSAN-1-13.pdf Download (470kB)
	PDF (Bab I) Bab 1_SKRIPSI_RAZAN HASSAN-14-24.pdf Download (320kB)
	PDF (Bab II) Bab 2_SKRIPSI_RAZAN HASSAN-25-51.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (401kB)
	PDF (Bab III) Bab 3_SKRIPSI_RAZAN HASSAN-52-88.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (496kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) Bab 4_SKRIPSI_RAZAN HASSAN-89-93.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (270kB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) Daftar Pustaka_SKRIPSI_RAZAN HASSAN-94-99.pdf Download (256kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) Surat Pernyataan Publikasi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (164kB)

Abstract

The abuse and illicit trafficking of narcotics in Indonesia continue to rise annually, with narcotic recidivism becoming a serious problem in the national criminal justice system. In 2023, 52.97% of the total prison population consisted of narcotics convicts, a large portion of whom were repeat offenders. This study aims to analyze judges' considerations in rendering verdicts against narcotic recidivists and to examine the application of sentencing for narcotic recidivists under prevailing laws and regulations. The research method employed is normative juridical with a case approach and a doctrinal approach. The research objects comprise three court decisions with permanent legal force: Decision No. 561/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Kis., Decision No. 124/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Pal., and Decision No. 189/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Gst. The results indicate that judicial consideration encompasses two dimensions: juridical (fulfillment of criminal elements, evidence, and statutory provisions) and non-juridical (perpetrator's motive, socio-economic background, age, and social impact). Recidivist status is consistently noted as an aggravating circumstance in all three decisions. However, Article 144 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which mandates a one-third sentence aggravation for recidivists, was not explicitly and measurably applied, resulting in sentencing disparities between courts. The absence of standardized sentencing guidelines is identified as the primary cause of such inconsistency.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	pertimbangan hakim, putusan, residivis, narkotika.
Subjects:	K Law > Indonesia Law > Perangkat Hukum > Hakim K Law > Indonesia Law > Hukum Pidana
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > S1 Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	RAZAN HASSAN AHMAD HASSAN AKESH
Date Deposited:	16 Jul 2026 02:45
Last Modified:	16 Jul 2026 02:45
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/146110

Actions (login required)

View Item