Irwanto, Galang Renanda and , Hanifah Febriani, S.H., LL.M. (2025) Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menentukan Ketiadaan Mens Rea Pada Kasus Pemeliharaan Satwa Dilindungi (Studi Kasus Nomor 809/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Dps). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](https://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
NASKAH_PUBLIKASI_C100210241.pdf Download (412kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (959kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (349kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (400kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (456kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (264kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (260kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI_C100210241.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (223kB) |
Abstract
Indonesia has a high level of biodiversity, but human activities pose a threat to wildlife. Low public awareness of the law leads to violations that are committed without malicious intent (mens rea). The case of I Nyoman Sukena is an important example of judges considering the element of intent in their verdicts. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative, case, and conceptual approach. Data was obtained through a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. Analysis was conducted using a descriptive-qualitative approach. The study found that the actus reus element in the I Nyoman Sukena case was proven, but the mens rea element was not fulfilled because the defendant was unaware that the animals he kept were protected species. The judge considered the absence of malicious intent, social background, and limited legal awareness, and issued an acquittal (vrijspraak). The conclusion highlights the importance of applying mens rea in assessing criminal liability. In the Sukena case, although the act objectively violated the law, the absence of malicious intent resulted in the subjective requirement not being met. The judge's decision reflects a balance between legal certainty and the principle of justice, particularly for communities with limited understanding of the law.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Mens rea, Judicial consideration, Protected animals |
| Subjects: | K Law K Law > Law (General) K Law > Indonesia Law > Perangkat Hukum > Hakim K Law > Indonesia Law |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > S1 Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | GALANG RENANDA IRWANTO |
| Date Deposited: | 31 Jul 2025 07:07 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2025 06:09 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/136717 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
