SAPUTRI, WENY EKA (2011) A PRAGMATICS ANALYSIS OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE USED IN REVELATION BIBLE IN NEW TESTEMENT. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](http://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF (Front Page)
2_Front_Page.pdf Download (224kB) |
|
|
PDF (Chapter I)
3_Chapter_1.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (162kB) |
|
|
PDF (Chapter II)
4_Chapter_2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (141kB) |
|
|
PDF (Chapter III)
5_Chapter_3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (106kB) |
|
|
PDF (Chapter IV)
6_Chapter_4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (310kB) |
|
|
PDF (Chapter V)
7_Chapter_5.pdf Download (99kB) |
|
|
PDF (References)
8_References.pdf Download (99kB) |
|
|
PDF (Appendix)
9_Data_Apendixes.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (133kB) |
Abstract
This research deals with Figurative Language used in Revelation Bible in New Testament. The research is aimed at describing type of Figurative Language and the implicature of figurative language used in Revelation Bible in New Testament. In achieving the objectives, the researcher uses descriptive qualitative as the type of the research. The data source of this research is Revelation Bible. In collecting the data the writer uses documentation method and the steps are Reading the Revelation Bible, underlying the Figurative Language found in Revelation Bible, retyping and coding the data. The techniques of analyzing data of this research are describing the type of figurative language and analyzing the implicature based on the context of pragmatics. The result of the study shows that first, the type of figurative languages in revelation bible are: The figurative Languages of Simile (38.9%), Metaphors (8.3%), Personifications (8.3%), Apostrophe (2.8%), Paradox (2.8%), Synecdoche (8.3%), Hyperbole (13.9%) and Symbol (16.7%). Second, the implicature of figurative language used in revelation bible are: Commanding (13.9%), Promising (5.5%), Reminding (52.8%), Threatening (22.2%), Teasing (2.8%) and Suggesting (2.8%). In addition, all of the data belongs to conversational implicature and none of them are in the type of conventional implicature.
| Item Type: | Karya ilmiah (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | RAK A320/2011-40 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Figurative language, implicature, pragmatics |
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris |
| Depositing User: | Ari Fatmawati |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Jul 2011 07:12 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Oct 2011 06:36 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/13569 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
