Pradina, Safira Hafis and , Fahmi Fairuzzaman, S.H.,M.H., L.L.M.. (2025) Disparitas Putusan Hakim Pada Kasus Pencabulan Anak: Studi Kasus Antara Putusan Nomor 177/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jap Dan Putusan Nomor 254/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mks. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](https://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
Naskah Publikasi.pdf Download (326kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (812kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB 1.pdf Download (431kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (512kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (556kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (214kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (228kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
Surat Pernyataan Publikasi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (346kB) |
Abstract
Disparity or Criminal decisions with the same type of case is a challenge for judges in implementing Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power Article 53 Paragraph (1) where judges are responsible for the determinations and decisions they make. The objectives of this research are: 1). To find out the basis of judge’s considerations in deciding cases; 2). To find out what are the causes of disparities in case decisions. This research is normative legal research. This type of research approach is a case approach. The data collecting method uses library research.The data analysis method is guided by using qualitative methods to produce descriptive research. The inequality in decision, especially in cases of child abuse is an irony in how judges give their considerations. The judge’s implementation of these two decisions proves the existing viewpoints and belief tendencies. The judge’s confidence appears together with sufficient evidence, but the cause of the disparity that is difficult to avoid is the consistency in how the judge considers his decision. Disparity is a result of how judges want to obtain legal certainty and justice simultaneously. There are not disparities in the two decisions based on how the judge considers their decision because the differences of the case position.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Disparitas, Hakim, Pencabulan Anak, Pertimbangan Hakim, |
| Subjects: | K Law > Law (General) K Law > Indonesia Law > Hukum Pidana |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > S1 Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | SAFIRA HAFIS PRADINA |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Jan 2025 06:47 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Jan 2025 06:47 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/130511 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
