Darmawan, Ivan and , Prof. Dr. Absori, S.H.,M.Hum. (2024) Studi Komparasi Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Wanprestasi(Analisis Yuridis Perkara Nomor 2/Pdt.G/2023/PN Byl, Nomor 13/Pdt.G/2023/PN Byl dan Nomor 118/Pdt.G/2023/PN Skt). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
Naskah Publikasi Ivan.pdf Download (115kB) |
|
PDF (Halaman Depan)
HALAMAN DEPAN (2).pdf Download (551kB) |
|
PDF (Bab I)
BAB I.pdf Download (304kB) |
|
PDF (Bab II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (258kB) |
|
PDF (Bab III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (254kB) |
|
PDF (Bab IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (129kB) |
|
PDF (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (201kB) |
|
PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi)
surat pernyataan publikasi (1).pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (585kB) |
Abstract
This study aims to analyze to determine the settlement to be taken to compensate for the losses suffered by the Collector. This study analyzes the decisions No. 2/Pdt.G/2023/PN Byl, No. 13/Pdt.G/2023/PN Byl and No. 118/Pdt.G/2023/PN Skt issued by the district court as a result of the default law committed by the Defendant. The research method used is normative juridical which analyzes document review by utilizing various secondary sources, such as decrees, regulations, court decisions, legal theories, and expert opinions. The result of this study is that in case No. 1/Pdt.G/2023/PN Byl and 13/Pdt.G/2023/PN Byl, the Defendant defaulted on the payment of invoices due between July 18, 2017 to February 21, 2018, even though the goods had been received, causing 5 financial losses to the Plaintiff. In case No. 2/Pdt.G/2023/PN Byl and 2/Pdt.G/2023/PN Byl, the Defendant defaulted on the Statement to return Rp. 1,200,000,000 before February 12, 2020, which was used for the purpose of Murabahah Facility Financing, causing financial loss to the Plaintiff. In case No. 3/Pdt.G/2023/PN Skt and 118/Pdt.G/2023/PN Skt, the Defendant defaulted on the lack of payment of building materials in the amount of Rp. 68,900,000 (sixty-eight million nine hundred thousand rupiah) since June 2022, causing financial losses to the Plaintiff. The defendant was declared in default because it did not fulfill its payment obligations or did not comply with the agreement. The legal consequence of default is the obligation to pay by the party deemed to be in default, with the judge having the authority to impose additional sanctions such as damages or fines. This consistent approach confirms the principle of compliance with financial obligations established by legal documents.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Law of contracts, Agreements, Default. |
Subjects: | K Law > KI Indonesia Law > KP Hukum Perdata |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum |
Depositing User: | IVAN DARMAWAN |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jul 2024 01:49 |
Last Modified: | 29 Jul 2024 01:49 |
URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/125519 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |