Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim pada Putusan Perkara Pidana Penggelapan dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 51/Pid.B/2020/PN Pct)

Kusumadewi, Oktaviana Guntaram and , Dr. Natangsa Surbakti, S.H., M.Hum. (2023) Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim pada Putusan Perkara Pidana Penggelapan dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 51/Pid.B/2020/PN Pct). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (Naskah Publikasi) 02. Naskah Publikasi.pdf Download (367kB)
	PDF (Halaman Depan) 03. Halaman Depan.pdf Download (1MB)
	PDF (Bab I) 04. Bab I.pdf Download (356kB)
	PDF (Bab II) 05. Bab II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (335kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab III) 06. Bab III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (460kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Bab IV) 07. Bab IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (228kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) 08. Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (330kB)
	PDF (Lampiran) 09. Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (678kB) | Request a copy
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) 01. Surat Pernyataan Publikasi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (97kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Embezzlement in office is a crime that often occurs in various fields and levels of society. This problem was chosen because embezzlement in office often occurs in Pacitan. The research uses a normative approach. This type of descriptive research uses legal material sources in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques through document study. Data analysis techniques through deductive thinking patterns. This research is intended to determine the criminal act of embezzlement in office according to Indonesian positive law, the judge's considerations in deciding criminal cases in Decision Number 51/Pid.B/2020/PN Pct, and embezzlement in office according to Islamic law. In this research, differences were found in the criminal threats in Article 374 of the Criminal Code and Article 488 of Law No. 1 of 2023, and differences between criminal acts of embezzlement in office and corruption. The judge's considerations in deciding the criminal case in Decision Number 51/Pid.B/2020/PN Pct are in accordance with the evidence required according to Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the elements in Article 374 of the Criminal Code. In Islamic law, if we look at the elements of the crime of embezzlement in office, this crime falls into the category of ghulul, and the punishment for it is ta'zir.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Penggelapan dalam Jabatan, Pertimbangan Hakim, Ghulul
Subjects:	K Law
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Hukum
Depositing User:	OKTAVIANA GUNTARAM KUSUMADEWI
Date Deposited:	16 Nov 2023 04:05
Last Modified:	16 Nov 2023 04:05
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/118276

Actions (login required)

View Item