Bahtiar, Luth Hafizh and , Mohammad Zakki Azani, S.Th.I, M.Ed, Ph.D.,i and , x 4. Dr. Muh. Nur Rochim Maksum, S.Pd.I., M.Pd. (2023) Pengaruh Debat Ilmiah Asian Parliamentary Dan British Parliamentary Terhadap Pengembangan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa(Studi Kasus di Muhammadiyah English Debating Society/MEDS dan Nādy Al-Munādhoroh Li Al-lughoh Al-‘Arabiyyah/Namlah UMS). Thesis thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
![[img]](https://eprints.ums.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (Naskah Publikasi)
naskah publikasi.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN)
HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
PDF (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf Download (556kB) |
|
PDF (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (780kB) |
|
PDF (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (588kB) |
|
PDF (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (718kB) |
|
PDF (BAB V)
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (288kB) |
|
PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (271kB) |
|
PDF (LAMPIRAN)
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (587kB) |
|
PDF (PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH)
SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (713kB) |
Abstract
This research is motivated by the low ability of students to reason and think critically in Indonesia. In 2018, the PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) initiated by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development was a study to evaluate the education system which was attended by more than 70 countries around the world showing that Indonesia was ranked 7th from bottom . In addition, the growth of globalization which continues to develop encourages all aspects to adapt to the development of science and technology. In order to adapt required human resources who have good competence. Various educational research results show that critical thinking is able to prepare students in various disciplines, and can be used to prepare careers and real life. The purpose of this study was to identify the impact of scientific debate using 2 parliamentary systems, namely Asian Parliamentary and British Parliamentary, on increasing critical thinking skills in students at the Namlah student activity unit (Nādy Al-munādhoroh Li Al-lughoh Al-'arabiyyah) and MEDS (Muhammadiyah English Debating Society). Namlah is a student activity unit in the field of Arabic debate and MEDS is a student activity unit in the field of debate under the auspices of the Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. The research method used is qualitative. Digging data with in-depth interviews and observations of the informants. The results of the study show that scientific debates using the Asian and British Parliamentary systems have an impact on increasing students' critical thinking skills. This can be seen by using the theory put forward by Ennis that the character of critical thinking has aspects and indications, namely: giving simple explanations, building basic skills, concluding, providing further explanations, and managing strategies and tactics. All aspects have actually been applied to parliamentary scientific debates. The British Parliamentary has the positive side of strict regulations and complex obstacles, forcing participants to think quickly and prepare lots of arguments. In addition, the number of participants in each room was 8 people which were divided into the opening pro team, the closing pro team, the opening cons team, the closing counter team and each team really brought a different argument. The opening pro team and closing pro team are not allies, but all opponents. Meanwhile, Asian Parliamentary allows participants to focus more on one argument and has a duration of motion surgery so that motions are more mature. This is because in one room there are only 6 people who are divided into pro and con teams only. The Asian system is usually used by student activity units to train new members in motion surgery. The theory put forward by Slameto is that habits greatly influence the learning process. Critical thinking is also influenced by one's habits. If someone never tries to improve critical thinking, increased critical thinking will not occur. In the field, it was found that many members of the two Namlah and MEDS student activity units had not been active and intensively participated in training and scientific debate competitions. This is because debate is still considered difficult and only certain people and those who have high intelligence are able to participate.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Thesis) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | impact of scientific debate, critical thinking, scientific debate |
| Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Pasca Sarjana > Magister Pendidikan Islam |
| Depositing User: | LUTH HAFIZH BAHTIAR |
| Date Deposited: | 26 Jul 2023 05:11 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Aug 2023 02:15 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/113952 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
