Perbandingan Strategi Group Investigation Dengan Examples Non Examples Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Kelas IV SDN Manahan Tahun 2015/2016

Saputri, Emalia and , Drs. Mulyadi SK,SH.,M.Pd (2016) Perbandingan Strategi Group Investigation Dengan Examples Non Examples Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Kelas IV SDN Manahan Tahun 2015/2016. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

	PDF (NASKAH PUBLIKASI) ARTIKEL PUBLIKASI.pdf Download (684kB)
	PDF (HALAMAN DEPAN) HALAMAN DEPAN.pdf Download (740kB)
	PDF (Bab I) BAB I.pdf Download (172kB)
	PDF (Bab II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (568kB)
	PDF (Bab III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (348kB)
	PDF (Bab IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (484kB)
	PDF (Bab V) BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (158kB)
	PDF (Lampiran) LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB)
	PDF (Daftar Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (91kB)
	PDF (Surat Pernyataan Publikasi) SURAT PERNYATAAN PUBLIKASI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (243kB)

Abstract

The purposeof this studyisto : (1) Know the differencebetween theeffect ofusing strategy Group Investigation with Examples non Examples strategy on learning outcomesfourthgrade science studentsSDN Manahanthe academic year2015/2016. (2) know the effect ofa larger strategybetween strategywith the strategyGroup Investigation Examples non Examplesto the learning outcomesof studentsIVSDN Manahanthe academic year2015/2016Subjects in this study were class IV SDN Manahan , which consists of class IVA totaling 33 students who applied strategy Group Investigation and IVB totaling 321 students who applied strategies Examples non Examples .Data collection methodsused aretests anddocumentation. Data analysis techniqueused isthe t test, whichpreviouslyperformedthe prerequisite testanalysis is thebalance testwithF test, test for normalitywith theKolmogorov-Smirnov method.. Fromthe data analysiswith a significance levelof 5%can be concludedthat: (1) There is adifference of influencestrategieswithstrategiesGroup Investigation Examples non Examples on learning outcomesfourthgrade science studentsSDN Manahan the academic year2015/2016. Based on t testobtained t count>t table is-1,301>2,000 sothe hypothesisThere is a differencebetween theeffects ofthe strategywith theGroup Investigation Examples non Exampleson the results offourth-grade studentslearn scienceSDN Manahanacceptableacademic year2015/2016. (2) Strategy Group Investigationgreater influencethanstrategyExamples non Exampleson learning outcomesfourthgrade science studentsSDN Manahanthe academic year2015/2016.The average value of learning outcomes IPA IVA class by using strategy and IVB Group Investigation using the strategy Examples non examples , ie 69,54<72,65so the hypothesis Strategy Group Investigation effect is greater than the strategy Examples non Examples on learning outcomes IPA class IV SDN Manahan acceptable academic year 2015/2016.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Group Investigation, Examples non Examples, Outcomes IPA
Subjects:	Q Science > Q Science (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar
Depositing User:	EMALIA SAPUTRI
Date Deposited:	28 Apr 2016 06:43
Last Modified:	21 Oct 2024 02:17
URI:	http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/43068

Actions (login required)

View Item